BTW, DOWNLOAD part of ExamBoosts SD-WAN-Engineer dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NA6nbvoWxlN0_pNAGyQYKjK1yuQRt07z
The ExamBoosts is a leading platform that has been helping the Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN-Engineer exam aspirants for many years. Over this long time period, thousands of Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN Engineer (SD-WAN-Engineer) exam candidates have passed their dream Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN-Engineer Certification Exam and have become a member of Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN-Engineer certification exam community. They all got help from valid, updated, and real SD-WAN-Engineer exam dumps.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
>> Latest Study SD-WAN-Engineer Questions <<
Our professional experts have carefully compiled our SD-WAN-Engineer practice braindumps to be the best seller in the market. The information is provided in the form of our SD-WAN-Engineer exam questions and answers, following the style of the real exam paper pattern. So if you buy our SD-WAN-Engineer training guide, you will find that it is easy to pass the exam for it is exam-oriented. What is more, you will learn a lot of work skills according to the latest information.
NEW QUESTION # 15
Which troubleshooting action should be taken when resources at one branch site can reach the internet but cannot be reached from the data center (DC)?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In the Prisma SD-WAN architecture, reachability between sites is managed by the Control Plane, which automatically advertises prefixes across the secure fabric based on their scope. If a branch site has successful Direct Internet Access (DIA) but is invisible to the Data Center (DC), it indicates that while the local ION is online, its internal network information has not been propagated to the rest of the SD-WAN fabric.
The most common cause for this behavior is that the LAN interfaces or static routes at the branch are configured with a Local scope rather than a Global scope. When a prefix is set to "Local," the ION device treats that network as reachable only within that specific site; it will not advertise that prefix to the Controller for distribution to other ION devices, such as those at the Data Center. By ensuring the LAN branch prefixes are set to "global" (Option B), the administrator instructs the ION device to share these routes with the global fabric.
Once the prefix is marked as global, the Prisma SD-WAN Controller identifies it as a reachable destination and updates the routing tables of all peer ION devices in the same domain, including the DC gateways. This allows the Data Center to build a valid path to the branch resources over the secure VPN tunnels. Options like creating static routes (Option A) or changing site modes (Option C) do not address the fundamental requirement of prefix advertisement within the software-defined fabric, which relies on correctly defined metadata like route scope.
NEW QUESTION # 16
When configuring SASE connectivity with easy onboarding at a branch, which two options must be selected?
(Choose two.)
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Prisma SD-WAN simplifies the integration with Prisma Access through a feature known as "CloudBlades," specifically the Prisma Access for Networks CloudBlade. The "easy onboarding" workflow is designed to automate the complex task of establishing secure tunnels between Branch ION devices and the SASE security processing nodes (SPNs).
When an administrator initiates this process, the system abstracts the manual configuration of IKE and IPSec parameters. Instead of manually defining an IPSec Crypto Profile or an IKE Profile (which are automatically handled by the CloudBlade orchestration), the user must specify where the traffic is going and which physical resources will handle the connection. The Prisma Access Primary Location (Option B) is a mandatory selection because it determines the geographical region and specific compute instance within the Prisma Access cloud that will serve as the primary security gateway for that branch.
Furthermore, the IPSec Termination Node (Option D) must be selected to define the specific endpoint within the Prisma Access infrastructure where the ION device's tunnels will terminate. This selection ensures that the Controller can properly orchestrate the site-to-site VPN tunnels, ensuring that the branch traffic is correctly routed to the SASE fabric for security inspection. By selecting these two options, the CloudBlade can automatically negotiate the rest of the tunnel parameters, significantly reducing the potential for human error and accelerating the deployment of a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) architecture across multiple branch locations.
NEW QUESTION # 17
A network engineer is able to ping and traceroute from SD-WAN branch IP 192.168.1.123 to servers in primary data center - DC1, but is unable to ping or traceroute to a server 10.2.2.22 in the newly configured secondary data center, DC2.
The DC2 ION device is advertising the branch IP subnet 192.168.1.0/24 to the DC2 core via eBGP Core Peer.
The DC2 data center site has site prefix 10.2.2.0/23 configured.
Which configuration will resolve the issue in this scenario?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In a Prisma SD-WAN deployment, the routing of traffic between branches and Data Centers (DCs) relies on the proper synchronization between the AppFabric (the overlay) and the local routing protocols (the underlay
/LAN side). In this scenario, the branch can successfully reach DC1, indicating the branch ION is correctly participating in the fabric. However, traffic to DC2 (10.2.2.22) is failing.
The DC2 site has the site prefix 10.2.2.0/23 configured. In Prisma SD-WAN, defining a site prefix informs the Controller that this specific subnet "belongs" to that site, causing the Controller to advertise reachability for this prefix to all other ION devices in the fabric. Consequently, when the branch ION (192.168.1.123) attempts to reach 10.2.2.22, it correctly identifies DC2 as the destination and encapsulates the traffic toward the DC2 ION.
The bottleneck occurs once the packet arrives at the DC2 ION. While the ION is advertising the branch subnet (192.168.1.0/24) to the DC Core (ensuring the return path), the ION itself must know how to forward the incoming traffic from the branch to the internal DC network. If the DC2 ION does not have a specific route in its local routing table for the 10.2.2.0/23 subnet pointing to the DC Core's internal interface, the packet will be dropped.
According to Palo Alto Networks best practices for Data Center ION deployment, a static default route (0.0.0.0/0) should be configured on the ION device pointing toward the DC Core's next-hop IP address. This ensures that any traffic received from the AppFabric destined for internal DC resources-which are not directly connected to the ION-is successfully handed off to the core switching fabric for final delivery.
Adding this default route (Option A) resolves the reachability issue by providing the "last-hop" routing instruction within the DC.
NEW QUESTION # 18
An administrator has configured a Zone-Based Firewall (ZBFW) policy on a branch ION. They created a rule to "Allow" traffic from the "Guest" zone to the "Internet" zone. However, users in the "Guest" zone are reporting they cannot reach a specific public website, and the Flow Browser shows the flow state as "REJECT".
What is the most likely reason for this specific rejection, assuming the "Allow" rule is correctly placed at the top of the list?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
In Prisma SD-WAN, security policies can be applied via Policy Stacks, which often have a hierarchy.
Stack Precedence: A common configuration involves a Global Security Stack (applied to all sites) and a Local/Site Security Stack (specific to one site). If the administrator configured a "Global" rule that says "Deny Access to Gambling Sites" (or a specific IP list), and that rule is higher in the binding order or part of a higher-priority stack, it will enforce the block before the local "Allow Guest to Internet" rule is processed.
Specifics of "REJECT": The state REJECT specifically implies a policy enforcement action (sending a TCP RST or ICMP Unreachable) rather than a silent drop or a routing failure.
Why not A? If the "Allow" rule is at the top and matches the traffic parameters (Zone/IP), the Default Deny at the bottom would never be reached. The issue implies a higher priority Deny exists.
NEW QUESTION # 19
An administrator has configured a Path Policy for "ERP_Traffic". The policy allows two public internet links, "ISP-A" and "ISP-B", both marked as "Active". The Path Quality Profile (SLA) requires a latency of less than 150ms. Currently, both ISP-A and ISP-B have a latency of 40ms, well within the SLA.
How does the Prisma SD-WAN ION determine which link to use for a new flow of "ERP_Traffic" when both active paths meet the SLA requirements?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
Prisma SD-WAN utilizes a sophisticated decision engine for Application-Based Path Selection that goes beyond simple failover. When configuring a Path Policy, the administrator defines "Active" paths and a "Path Quality Profile" (SLA).
SLA Compliance (The Filter): First, the system filters the available paths based on the Path Quality Profile. In this scenario, both ISP-A and ISP-B have 40ms latency against a 150ms threshold. Both are "green" or compliant paths.
Selection Criteria (The Tie-Breaker): When multiple paths are configured as "Active" and all meet the performance SLA, the ION device aims to optimize the overall user experience and network utilization. The default behavior for load balancing across healthy, compliant active paths is to select the path with the highest available bandwidth capacity.
By steering new flows to the link with the most "headroom" (available Mbps), the system prevents the saturation of a smaller link (e.g., a 20Mbps DSL line) while a larger link (e.g., 1Gbps Fiber) sits underutilized. This maximizes the aggregate throughput for the site. While latency is the qualifier, bandwidth availability is often the selector for compliant paths. Note that if the application was defined as "Real-Time" and configured for packet duplication, behavior would differ, but for standard traffic, capacity-based distribution is the standard active/active logic.
NEW QUESTION # 20
......
All of our considerate designs have a strong practicability. We are still researching on adding more useful buttons on our SD-WAN-Engineer Test Answers. The aim of our design is to improve your learning and all of the functions of our products are completely real. Then the learning plan of the SD-WAN-Engineer exam torrent can be arranged reasonably. You need to pay great attention to the questions that you make lots of mistakes. If you are interested in our products, click to purchase and all of the functions. In a word, our company seriously promises that we do not cheat every customer.
SD-WAN-Engineer Formal Test: https://www.examboosts.com/Palo-Alto-Networks/SD-WAN-Engineer-practice-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free 2026 Palo Alto Networks SD-WAN-Engineer dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ExamBoosts: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NA6nbvoWxlN0_pNAGyQYKjK1yuQRt07z