P.S. Free 2026 IAPP CIPP-E dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Dumpkiller: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KfGH4mRZrEkxcuQWoP04Oh4q1vAKkFz5
Dumpkiller is the best catalyst to help IT personage be successful. Many people who have passed some IT related certification exams used our Dumpkiller's training tool. Our Dumpkiller expert team use their experience for many people participating in IAPP certification CIPP-E exam to develope the latest effective training tools, which includes IAPP CIPP-E Certification simulation test, the current exam and answers. Our Dumpkiller's test questions and answers have 95% similarity with the real exam. With Dumpkiller's training tool your IAPP certification CIPP-E exams can be easy passed.
IAPP CIPP/E certification exam is an essential certification for privacy professionals who work in or with organizations that operate within the EU or handle EU citizens' personal data. Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) certification demonstrates an individual's knowledge and understanding of European data protection laws and regulations, particularly the GDPR, and is an excellent way to advance one's career in the privacy field.
>> IAPP CIPP-E Latest Braindumps Sheet <<
The Dumpkiller is a reliable platform that is committed to making your preparation for the IAPP CIPP-E examination easier and more effective. To meet this objective, the Dumpkiller is offering updated and real Certified Information Privacy Professional/Europe (CIPP/E) CIPP-E exam dumps. These IAPP CIPP-E Exam Questions are approved by experts. They work together and analyze the examination content to compile most probable CIPP-E real dumps in three formats. These IAPP Exams questions will surely appear in the next IAPP CIPP-E test.
The CIPP-E Certification Exam is designed for professionals who are involved in privacy-related roles such as data protection officers, privacy consultants, privacy lawyers, compliance officers, and information security professionals. CIPP-E exam is also ideal for professionals who are looking to advance their careers in the privacy field or those who are new to the field and are looking to gain a comprehensive understanding of the privacy laws and regulations of Europe.
NEW QUESTION # 264
According to Article 14 of the GDPR, how long does a controller have to provide a data subject with necessary privacy information, if that subject's personal data has been obtained from other sources?
Answer: B
Explanation:
According to Article 14 of the GDPR, if the controller obtains personal data from other sources, such as third parties or publicly accessible sources, the controller must provide the data subject with the necessary privacy information, such as the identity and contact details of the controller, the purposes and legal basis of the processing, the categories of personal data concerned, the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, and the rights of the data subject. The controller must provide this information within a reasonable period after obtaining the personal data, but no later than one month, having regard to the specific circumstances in which the personal data are processed. However, there are some exceptions to this rule, such as if the data subject already has the information, if the provision of the information proves impossible or would involve a disproportionate effort, if the obtaining or disclosure of the data is expressly laid down by EU or member state law, or if the personal data must remain confidential subject to an obligation of professional secrecy12. References:
* GDPR, Article 14
* Free CIPP/E Study Guide, page 19, section 2.5.1
* CIPP/E Certification, page 14, section 1.2.1
* Art. 14 GDPR - Information to be provided where personal data have not been obtained from the data subject
* Article 14 GDPR - GDPRhub
NEW QUESTION # 265
SCENARIO
Louis, a long-time customer of Bedrock Insurance, was involved in a minor car accident a few months ago.
Although no one was hurt, Louis has been plagued by texts and calls from a company called Accidentable offering to help him recover compensation for personal injury. Louis has heard about insurance companies selling customers' data to third parties, and he's convinced that Accidentable must have gotten his information from Bedrock Insurance.
Louis has also been receiving an increased amount of marketing information from Bedrock, trying to sell him their full range of their insurance policies.
Perturbed by this, Louis has started looking at price comparison sites on the internet and has been shocked to find that other insurers offer much cheaper rates than Bedrock, even though he has been a loyal customer for many years. When his Bedrock policy comes up for renewal, he decides to switch to Zantrum Insurance.
In order to activate his new insurance policy, Louis needs to supply Zantrum with information about his No Claims bonus, his vehicle and his driving history. After researching his rights under the GDPR, he writes to ask Bedrock to transfer his information directly to Zantrum. He also takes this opportunity to ask Bedrock to stop using his personal data for marketing purposes.
Bedrock supplies Louis with a PDF and XML (Extensible Markup Language) versions of his No Claims Certificate, but tells Louis it cannot transfer his data directly to Zantrum as this is not technically feasible.
Bedrock also explains that Louis's contract included a provision whereby Louis agreed that his data could be used for marketing purposes; according to Bedrock, it is too late for Louis to change his mind about this. It angers Louis when he recalls the wording of the contract, which was filled with legal jargon and very confusing.
In the meantime, Louis is still receiving unwanted calls from Accidentable Insurance. He writes to Accidentable to ask for the name of the organization that supplied his details to them. He warns Accidentable that he plans to complain to the data protection authority, because he thinks their company has been using his data unlawfully. His letter states that he does not want his data being used by them in any way.
Accidentable's response letter confirms Louis's suspicions. Accidentable is Bedrock Insurance's wholly owned subsidiary, and they received information about Louis's accident from Bedrock shortly after Louis submitted his accident claim. Accidentable assures Louis that there has been no breach of the GDPR, as Louis' s contract included, a provision in which he agreed to share his information with Bedrock's affiliates for business purposes.
Louis is disgusted by the way in which he has been treated by Bedrock, and writes to them insisting that all his information be erased from their computer system.
Based on the GDPR's position on the use of personal data for direct marketing purposes, which of the following is true about Louis's rights as a data subject?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Louis has the right to object at any time to the use of his data and Bedrock must honor his request to cease use.
The GDPR states that "where personal data are processed for direct marketing purposes, the data subject shall have the right to object at any time to processing of personal data concerning him or her for such marketing" and that "where the data subject objects to processing for direct marketing purposes, the personal data shall no longer be processed for such purposes."3 This right applies regardless of whether the data subject has previously consented to the use of his or her data, or whether the data are required for a legal claim or a legitimate interest. The data subject must be informed of this right clearly and separately from any other information at the time of the first communication with him or her, and must be provided with an easy way to exercise it.2 Therefore, Louis can object to the use of his data by Bedrock and Accidentable for direct marketing purposes, and they must stop processing his data for such purposes as soon as they receive his objection. Louis can also withdraw his consent for any other processing of his data that he has previously agreed to, such as sharing his data with Bedrock's affiliates.4
NEW QUESTION # 266
A company in France suffers a robbery over the weekend owing to a faulty alarm system. When it is determined that the break-in involves the loss of a substantial amount of data, the company decides on a CCTV system to monitor for future incidents. Company technicians install cameras in the entrance of the building, hallways and offices. Footage is recorded continuously, and is monitored by the home office in the United States. What is the most realistic step the company could take to address their security concerns and comply with the personal data processing principles set out in Article 5 of the GDPR?
Answer: A
NEW QUESTION # 267
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Joe is the new privacy manager for Who-R-U, a Canadian business that provides DNA analysis. The company is headquartered in Montreal, and all of its employees are located there. The company offers its services to Canadians only: Its website is in English and French, it accepts only Canadian currency, and it blocks internet traffic from outside of Canada (although this solution doesn't prevent all non-Canadian traffic). It also declines to process orders that request the DNA report to be sent outside of Canada, and returns orders that show a non-Canadian return address.
Bob, the President of Who-R-U, thinks there is a lot of interest for the product in the EU, and the company is exploring a number of plans to expand its customer base.
The first plan, collegially called We-Track-U, will use an app to collect information about its current Canadian customer base. The expansion will allow its Canadian customers to use the app while traveling abroad. He suggests that the company use this app to gather location information. If the plan shows promise, Bob proposes to use push notifications and text messages to encourage existing customers to pre-register for an EU version of the service. Bob calls this work plan, We-Text-U. Once the company has gathered enough pre- registrations, it will develop EU-specific content and services.
Another plan is called Customer for Life. The idea is to offer additional services through the company's app, like storage and sharing of DNA information with other applications and medical providers. The company's contract says that it can keep customer DNA indefinitely, and use it to offer new services and market them to customers. It also says that customers agree not to withdraw direct marketing consent. Paul, the marketing director, suggests that the company should fully exploit these provisions, and that it can work around customers' attempts to withdraw consent because the contract invalidates them.
The final plan is to develop a brand presence in the EU. The company has already begun this process. It is in the process of purchasing the naming rights for a building in Germany, which would come with a few offices that Who-R-U executives can use while traveling internationally. The office doesn't include any technology or infrastructure; rather, it's simply a room with a desk and some chairs.
On a recent trip concerning the naming-rights deal, Bob's laptop is stolen. The laptop held unencrypted DNA reports on 5,000 Who-R-U customers, all of whom are residents of Canada. The reports include customer name, birthdate, ethnicity, racial background, names of relatives, gender, and occasionally health information.
The Customer for Life plan may conflict with which GDPR provision?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The Customer for Life plan may conflict with Article 7 of the GDPR, which states that "the data subject shall have the right to withdraw his or her consent at any time" and that "it shall be as easy to withdraw as to give consent" 1. The plan violates this principle by stating that customers agree not to withdraw direct marketing consent and that the company can ignore any attempts to do so. This is not a valid way of obtaining or maintaining consent, as consent must be freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous 2. Moreover, the plan may also conflict with Article 21 of the GDPR, which gives data subjects the right to object to direct marketing at any time 3. References: 1: Article 7(3) of the GDPR 2: Article 4(11) of the GDPR 3: Article 21 (2) of the GDPR I hope this helps. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask. #
NEW QUESTION # 268
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
You have just been hired by a toy manufacturer based in Hong Kong. The company sells a broad range of dolls, action figures and plush toys that can be found internationally in a wide variety of retail stores. Although the manufacturer has no offices outside Hong Kong and in fact does not employ any staff outside Hong Kong, it has entered into a number of local distribution contracts. The toys produced by the company can be found in all popular toy stores throughout Europe, the United States and Asia. A large portion of the company's revenue is due to international sales.
The company now wishes to launch a new range of connected toys, ones that can talk and interact with children. The CEO of the company is touting these toys as the next big thing, due to the increased possibilities offered: The figures can answer children's questions on various subjects, such as mathematical calculations or the weather. Each figure is equipped with a microphone and speaker and can connect to any smartphone or tablet via Bluetooth. Any mobile device within a 10-meter radius can connect to the toys via Bluetooth as well. The figures can also be associated with other figures (from the same manufacturer) and interact with each other for an enhanced play experience.
When a child asks the toy a question, the request is sent to the cloud for analysis, and the answer is generated on cloud servers and sent back to the figure. The answer is given through the figure's integrated speakers, making it appear as though that the toy is actually responding to the child's question. The packaging of the toy does not provide technical details on how this works, nor does it mention that this feature requires an internet connection. The necessary data processing for this has been outsourced to a data center located in South Africa. However, your company has not yet revised its consumer-facing privacy policy to indicate this.
In parallel, the company is planning to introduce a new range of game systems through which consumers can play the characters they acquire in the course of playing the game. The system will come bundled with a portal that includes a Near-Field Communications (NFC) reader. This device will read an RFID tag in the action figure, making the figure come to life onscreen. Each character has its own stock features and abilities, but it is also possible to earn additional ones by accomplishing game goals. The only information stored in the tag relates to the figures' abilities. It is easy to switch characters during the game, and it is possible to bring the figure to locations outside of the home and have the character's abilities remain intact.
Why is this company obligated to comply with the GDPR?
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 269
......
CIPP-E Certification Exam Cost: https://www.dumpkiller.com/CIPP-E_braindumps.html
P.S. Free & New CIPP-E dumps are available on Google Drive shared by Dumpkiller: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1KfGH4mRZrEkxcuQWoP04Oh4q1vAKkFz5