BTW, DOWNLOAD part of DumpsTests Plat-Arch-204 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oinTWyvXGemZyMRxvnkF6jw1zqshnTje
Constantly updated multiple mock exams with a great number of questions that will help you in better self-assessment. Memorize all your previous Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) exam questions attempts and display all the changes in your results at the end of each Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Practice Exam attempt. Users will be able to customize the Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice test software by time or question types. Supported on all Windows-based PCs.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce B2C Solution Architect Salesforce System Architect |
| Passing Score: | 67% |
| Exam Format: | Multiple-select, Multiple-choice |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Real Exam Qty: | 60-65 |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online (proctored) or Onsite at a testing center |
| Pre Condition: | One year of Integration Architecture experience and three to four years of experience on Salesforce platform |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/integrationarchitect |
>> Valid Plat-Arch-204 Test Pass4sure <<
You will receive a registration code and download instructions via email. We will be happy to assist you with any questions regarding our products. Our Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice exam software helps to prepare applicants to practice time management, problem-solving, and all other tasks on the standardized exam and lets them check their scores. The Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect (Plat-Arch-204) practice test results help students to evaluate their performance and determine their readiness without difficulty.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 93
Universal Containers (UC) is a global financial company. UC support agents would like to open bank accounts on the spot for customers who inquire about UC products. During the bank account opening process, the agents execute credit checks for the customers through external agencies. At any given time, up to 30 concurrent reps will be using the service to perform credit checks for customers. Which error handling mechanisms should be built to display an error to the agent when the credit verification process has failed?
Answer: A
Explanation:
In a synchronous Request-Reply integration-where a bank agent is waiting for a real-time credit check to open an account-the error handling strategy must balance user experience with system resilience. Handling these errors at the Middleware layer is the architecturally preferred solution for managing complex retry logic and providing a clean response to Salesforce.
If the external credit agency's service is momentarily unavailable, the middleware (such as an ESB or MuleSoft) can automatically retry the request multiple times using a pre-defined strategy (e.g., exponential backoff). This "self-healing" behavior can often resolve transient network issues before the Salesforce agent even realizes there was a problem. If the retries fail, the middleware then returns a structured error message to Salesforce, which is displayed to the agent via the UI.
Option B (Fire and Forget) is unsuitable for this use case because the agent needs the result immediately to proceed with the bank account opening; they cannot afford to wait for a background process to finish hours later. Option C (Mock Service) is a testing tool and has no place in a production environment where real financial decisions are being made. By delegating error management to the middleware, UC ensures that its Salesforce instance remains performant (avoiding long-running request timeo1112uts) while maximizing the chances of a successful credit check through automated, controlled retries.1314
NEW QUESTION # 94
Salesforce is considered to be the system of record for the customer. UC plans on using middleware to integrate Salesforce with external systems (ERP, ticketing, data lake). UC has a requirement to update the proper external system with record changes in Salesforce and vice versa. Which solution should an integration architect recommend?
Answer: C
Explanation:
In a multi-system landscape, maintaining data synchronization requires a robust Identity Mapping strategy. The standard Salesforce architectural recommendation is to use External ID fields to store the unique identifiers from each secondary system.
By storing the ERP ID, Ticketing ID, and Data Lake ID as External IDs in Salesforce, the middleware can perform upsert operations without needing to first query Salesforce for its internal ID. This reduces the number of API calls and simplifies the integration logic. Conversely, when Salesforce pushes a change to the ERP, it sends the stored ERP ID, allowing the ERP to instantly identify the correct target record.
Option B (Caching at the middleware) is a high-maintenance "anti-pattern" that introduces a new point of failure if the cache goes out of sync with the actual systems. Option C (Change Data Capture) is a mechanism for notifying systems of changes, but it does not solve the underlying identity mapping problem. Using External IDs creates a stable, searchable, and performant cross-reference that is the backbone of any successful "hub-and-spoke" integration architecture.
NEW QUESTION # 95
Northern Trail Outfitters is planning to perform nightly batch loads into Salesforce using the Bulk API. The CIO is curious about monitoring recommendations for the jobs from the technical architect. Which recommendation should help meet the requirements?
Answer: B
NEW QUESTION # 96
A company needs to integrate a legacy on-premise application that can only support SOAP API. After the integration architect evaluates the requirements and volume, they determine that the Fire and Forget integration pattern will be most appropriate for sending data from Salesforce to the external application and getting response back in a strongly-typed format.
Which integration capabilities should be used to integrate the two systems?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When integrating with a legacy SOAP-only application using a Fire and Forget pattern, Salesforce Outbound Messaging is the native, declarative choice.
Outbound Messaging is a platform feature that sends a SOAP message to a designated endpoint when specific criteria are met. It is inherently asynchronous and provides built-in reliability; if the legacy system is offline, Salesforce will automatically retry the delivery for up to 24 hours. This perfectly fits the "Fire and Forget" requirement.
For the strongly-typed response back (Remote Call-In), the Enterprise WSDL is the correct recommendation.1415 Enterprise WSDL: This is a strongly-typed WSDL generated specifically for one org's metadata. It includes specific references to16 custom objects and fields, ensu17ring that the legacy system can communicate with Salesforce using a rigid, predictable data structure.
Partner WSDL (Option C): This is a loosely-typed WSDL designed for developers building tools that must work across many different orgs; it is not ideal for an internal, strongly-typed legacy integration.
While Platform Events (Option B) are a modern alternative, they typically use REST or Streaming APIs, making them a less natural fit for an application that "can only support SOAP". By combining Outbound Messaging and the Enterprise WSDL, the architect provides a robust, SOAP-native solution that satisfies the business's technical constraints and reliability requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 97
A business requires automating the check and updating of the phone number type classification for all incoming calls. Up to 100,000 calls per day are received, and the business is flexible with timing (every 6-12 hours is sufficient). A Remote-Call-In and/or Batch Synchronization pattern via middleware is planned. Which component should an integration architect recommend to implement these patterns?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a Remote-Call-In or Batch Synchronization pattern where an external middleware initiates the connection to Salesforce, the external system must be authenticated. The standard Salesforce framework for this is the Connected App.
A Connected App provides a framework for external applications to integrate with Salesforce using APIs and standard protocols like OAuth 2.0. For a high-volume (100,000 records) batch process initiated by middleware every 6-12 hours, the architect would recommend a Connected App using a secure flow, such as the OAuth 2.0 JWT Bearer Flow. This allows the middleware to authenticate as a specific "Integration User" without storing clear-text passwords.
Option A (API Gateway) is used to manage and secure outbound calls from Salesforce or between external services; it does not handle inbound authentication to the Salesforce org itself. Option B (Remote Site Settings) is a whitelist configuration used purely to allow Salesforce to make outbound callouts to a specific URL; it provides no authentication mechanism for systems calling into Salesforce. By recommending a Connected App, the architect ensures that the middleware has the necessary permissions (scopes) to use the Bulk API-which is the appropriate mechanism for the 100,000 record volume-while maintaining a secure, auditable, and standard integration boundary.
NEW QUESTION # 98
......
Plat-Arch-204 Dumps Reviews: https://www.dumpstests.com/Plat-Arch-204-latest-test-dumps.html
P.S. Free & New Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by DumpsTests: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1oinTWyvXGemZyMRxvnkF6jw1zqshnTje