Financial Planning II (FPII) FP2 exam dumps is a surefire way to get success. Itcertmaster has assisted a lot of professionals in passing their FP2 test. In case you don't pass the Financial Planning II (FPII) FP2 exam after using FP2 pdf questions and practice tests, you have the full right to claim your full refund. You can download and test any FP2 Exam Questions format before purchase. So don't get worried, start FP2 exam preparation and get successful.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Financial Planning for Small Business | 15% | - Business Law and Agency Relationships
|
| Topic 2: Estate Planning | 10% | - Estate Distribution and Tax Planning
|
| Topic 3: Investment and Tax Planning | 10% | - Investment Management
|
| Topic 4: Insurance Planning | 10% | - Disability and Health Insurance
|
| Topic 5: Savings Planning and Debt Management | 10% | - Net Worth and Cash Management Planning
|
| Topic 6: Financial Planning Practice | 10% | - The Personal Financial Planning Process in Canada
|
| Topic 7: Retirement Planning | 20% | - Retirement Income Needs Analysis
|
| Topic 8: Family Law | 15% | - Fundamental Aspects of Family Law
|
>> Valid FP2 Practice Materials <<
Web-based Financial Planning II (FPII) (FP2) practice exam is a convenient format to evaluate and improve preparation for the exam. It is a FP2 browser-based application, which means you can access it from any operating system with an internet connection and a web browser. Unlike the desktop-based exam simulation software, the Financial Planning II (FPII) (FP2) browser-based practice test requires no plugins and software installation.
NEW QUESTION # 27
Samuel bought a permanent life insurance policy many years ago. The policy now has a cash value of
$40,000. Samuel is recently widowed and has two minor children that he supports. Since his wife passed away, he finds himself struggling to pay the bills, however he still needs the same death benefit and permanent life insurance. Considering his personal and financial situation, what would be the best non- forfeiture option to exercise on Samuel's policy to meet his needs?
Answer: B
Explanation:
An automatic premium loan is the best fit because Samuel needs to relieve his immediate premium-payment pressure while retaining the existing permanent policy.
An automatic premium loan uses available policy cash value as security for a loan that pays overdue premiums, thereby preventing the permanent policy from lapsing. The Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association identifies this specifically as a permanent-life-policy feature and a non-forfeiture mechanism.
Canadian permanent-policy documentation likewise explains that the feature keeps the policy in force by financing premiums from accumulated cash value.
Reduced paid-up insurance would eliminate future premiums and preserve permanent coverage, but the amount of insurance would be reduced. That conflicts with Samuel's need to retain his existing level of protection for his minor children. Extended term insurance generally preserves the original face amount only for a limited term and therefore sacrifices the permanent nature of the coverage. Cash surrender terminates the insurance altogether.
The automatic premium loan should still be monitored closely because interest accumulates and outstanding indebtedness reduces the net amount ultimately payable and can eventually threaten the policy if cash value becomes insufficient.
FPII reference/topic: Insurance Planning - permanent insurance; cash value; non-forfeiture options; automatic premium loans.
NEW QUESTION # 28
Franco is retiring from his job as a high school principal at the end of the year, at age 66. He has $100,000 in his group Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP). His wife will continue to work for another 10 years, and he does not need money from his group RRSP. What would be the best retirement option for Franco?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Franco should transfer the funds to his own RRSP and maintain the tax-deferred accumulation until the statutory RRSP maturity deadline, then convert the account to a RRIF.
Franco is 66. An RRSP must mature no later than the end of the calendar year in which its annuitant reaches age 71. CRA therefore allows approximately another five years of RRSP tax deferral before Franco must withdraw the funds, purchase an eligible annuity, or transfer them to a Registered Retirement Income Fund.
Because he does not currently require income, immediate RRIF withdrawals would unnecessarily accelerate taxable retirement income. However, option B cannot be maintained until his wife retires in 10 years: Franco would then be approximately 76, well beyond the age at which his RRSP must mature.
A direct transfer to a spousal RRSP is not the appropriate mechanism for moving his existing group RRSP retirement assets. Leaving the funds indefinitely in the group arrangement also fails to recognize the age-71 maturity requirement.
Option C precisely matches the available time horizon: preserve RRSP tax deferral for about five years, then establish a RRIF.
FPII reference/topic: Retirement Planning - group RRSPs; RRSP maturity; age 71 conversion requirements; RRIF planning.
NEW QUESTION # 29
Which resource will affect a pensioner's Guaranteed Income Supplement entitlement?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The Guaranteed Income Supplement is income-tested rather than asset-tested. Consequently, the relevant item is dividend income.
For GIS purposes, taxable investment income-including taxable Canadian dividends-forms part of the income used to determine entitlement. As income rises, GIS benefits may be reduced or eliminated depending on the recipient's marital status and applicable income threshold. Service Canada specifically includes interest, investment income, capital gains, and taxable Canadian dividends among the income sources relevant to income-tested OAS benefits.
By contrast, merely owning a cottage or holding investment assets does not directly reduce GIS because there is no general GIS asset test. Those assets become relevant when they generate reportable income-for example, rental income, interest, dividends, or realized taxable capital gains.
Old Age Security itself is specifically excluded when determining income for GIS purposes. Therefore, receiving the basic OAS pension is not treated in the same way as taxable investment income when calculating GIS entitlement.
This distinction is important in retirement planning because two clients with identical net worth can have very different GIS outcomes depending on the type, timing, and tax characterization of their retirement income.
FPII reference/topic: Retirement Planning - Old Age Security; Guaranteed Income Supplement; income testing; retirement-income taxation.
NEW QUESTION # 30
Xin Yi is a surgeon looking to get a disability insurance plan. His advisor has presented him with the following options:
Policy
Definition
Elimination period (days)
A
Any
30
B
Any
60
C
Own
30
D
Own
60
Which policy will likely have the highest premiums?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Policy C combines the two features that create the greatest potential liability for the insurer: an own- occupation definition and the shortest elimination period of 30 days.
An own-occupation disability definition is particularly valuable for a highly specialized professional such as a surgeon. Under an own-occupation structure, inability to perform the material duties of the insured's particular occupation can qualify as disability even where the individual may remain capable of performing some other occupation. An "any occupation" definition is more restrictive and therefore normally represents lower insurance risk. Canadian disability-plan documentation similarly distinguishes own-occupation eligibility from broader any-occupation standards.
The elimination period is the period between the commencement of disability and the point at which benefits become payable. A shorter elimination period causes the insurer to begin paying earlier and therefore normally increases the premium. A 60-day waiting period shifts more short-duration disability risk back to the insured.
Policy C provides both the broader own-occupation definition and the shorter 30-day elimination period.
Policy D has comparable occupational protection but delays benefits for 60 days.
FPII reference/topic: Insurance Planning - disability insurance; definitions of disability; elimination periods; determinants of premiums.
NEW QUESTION # 31
Diana has begun receiving spousal support payments and child support payments from her ex-husband Bruce.
What tax planning issue should be of greatest concern to Diana?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Diana's principal tax concern is the tax payable on qualifying spousal support payments that she receives.
Under Canadian income-tax rules, periodic spousal support paid pursuant to a qualifying court order or written agreement is generally deductible by the payer and taxable to the recipient. CRA therefore requires a recipient to include the taxable portion of qualifying spousal support in income.
Child support is treated differently. Under the current regime applicable to post-April 1997 arrangements, child support is generally not deductible by the payer and not taxable to the recipient. CRA expressly distinguishes the two forms of support on this basis.
Because Diana is receiving both forms of support, she should distinguish them carefully and plan for the income-tax liability associated with taxable spousal support. Depending on the amount received and the withholding arrangements, she may need to retain sufficient cash to satisfy tax instalments or the balance due when filing her tax return.
Option A concerns Bruce's potential deduction rather than Diana's tax liability. Options B and C incorrectly treat ordinary child-support payments as deductible or taxable.
FPII reference/topic: Family Law - taxation of support; spousal support; child support; payer deductions and recipient income inclusion.
NEW QUESTION # 32
......
The Financial Planning II (FPII) (FP2) certification exam is one of the top-rated career advancement certification exams. The Financial Planning II (FPII) (FP2) certification exam can play a significant role in career success. With the Financial Planning II (FPII) (FP2) certification you can gain several benefits such as validation of skills, career advancement, competitive advantage, continuing education, and global recognition of your skills and knowledge. The Financial Planning II (FPII) (FP2) certification is a valuable credential that assists you to enhance your existing skills and experience.
Pdf FP2 Free: https://www.itcertmaster.com/FP2.html