P.S. Free 2026 Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ActualTestsQuiz: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YMou9XcgQBm9oK8eJ-QRkGeKpV9gxkM0
We offer you free demo for Plat-Arch-204 pdf dumps. You can check out the questions quality and usability of our training material before you buy. Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 questions are written to the highest standards of technical accuracy with accurate answers. If you prepare for your exams using ActualTestsQuiz Plat-Arch-204 practice torrent, it is easy to succeed for your certification in the first attempt. Besides, we offer the money refund policy, in case of failure, you can ask for full refund.
| Certification Vendor: | Salesforce |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Exam |
| Exam Number: | Plat-Arch-204 |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Related Certifications: | Salesforce Certified Application Architect Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Salesforce Certified Data Architect Salesforce Certified System Architect Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect |
| Certificate Validity Period: | Maintained with annual certification maintenance requirements (no fixed expiration if maintained) |
| Real Exam Qty: | Approximately 60 questions |
| Passing Score: | Approximately 58% |
| Exam Price: | USD 400 |
| Exam Duration: | 105 minutes |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice, Multiple Select |
| Recommended Training: | Integration Architecture Designer Modules Salesforce Trailhead Integration Architect Learning Path |
| Exam Registration: | Salesforce Certification Registration Webassessor (Kryterion exam delivery) |
| Sample Questions: | Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online proctored or onsite testing center (varies by region and provider availability) |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended prerequisite: Salesforce Certified Application Architect and Salesforce Certified System Architect (part of the Salesforce Certified Technical Architect track is strongly recommended). |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/platformintegrationarchitect |
>> Exam Topics Plat-Arch-204 Pdf <<
In order to meet the different demands of the different customers, these experts from our company have designed three different versions of the Plat-Arch-204 reference guide. All customers have the right to choose the most suitable version according to their need. The PDF version of the Plat-Arch-204 exam prep has many special functions, including download the demo for free, support the printable format and so on. We can make sure that the PDF version of the Plat-Arch-204 Test Questions will be very convenient for all people. Of course, if you choose our Plat-Arch-204 study materials, you will love it.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 57
An integration architect has built a Salesforce application that integrates multiple systems and keeps them synchronized via Platform Events. What is taking place if events are only being published?
Answer: C
Explanation:
The timing of Platform Event publishing is a critical detail for an Integration Architect, as it affects data consistency and transaction integrity. In Salesforce, the default and most common behavior for publishing Platform Events from Apex is "Publish After Commit." When an architect chooses the "Publish After Commit" setting (defined at the event level), the events are held in a buffer and are only released to the event bus after the Apex transaction completes successfully. This ensures that if the database transaction fails and rolls back, the event-which might trigger external actions-is never sent. This prevents "ghost" events where an external system is told to process data that was never actually saved to the Salesforce database.
The question implies a standard scenario where events are being "published" into the bus. In this state, the events have passed the transaction boundary. If the events were only "being published from Apex" (Option C), it doesn't describe the state of the delivery or the transaction. Option B is technically incorrect for standard event publishing logic, as Salesforce explicitly separates the event bus from the database commit to maintain atomicity.
Understanding this "After Commit" behavior is vital when designing synchronization patterns. If the architect requires the event to be sent regardless of whether the transaction succeeds (e.g., for logging a failure), they would need to configure the event as "Publish Immediately." However, in a standard synchronization use case where events are "only being published," it signifies that the source transaction has finalized, and the messages are now available for subscribers (like middleware or other Salesforce orgs) to consume.
---
NEW QUESTION # 58
The director of customer service at Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to capture and trend specific business events that occur in Salesforce in real time. The metrics will be accessed in an ad-hoc manner using an external analytics system. The events include product exchanges, authorization clicks, subscription cancellations, and refund initiations via Cases. Which solution should meet these business requirements?
Answer: C
Explanation:
To meet a requirement for real-time event capture that supports an external analytics system, the arc14hitect must choose a pattern that is scalable, decoupled, and reliable. Platform Events are the modern standard for this use case.
By using a Case Trigger to publish a specific Platform Event, NTO creates a highly decoupled Publish/Subscribe architecture. The external analytics system (or a middleware layer feeding it) acts as a subscriber to the event channel. This is superior to standard callouts or outbound messaging for several reasons:
Durability: Platform Events offer a 72-hour retention window. If the analytics system is momentarily offline, it can use the Replay ID to retrieve missed events.
Atomic Transactions: Triggers can be configured to publish events only after the database transaction successfully commits ("Publish After Commit"), ensuring the analytics system doesn't receive data for transactions that were eventually rolled back.
Event Volume: Platform Events are designed to handle much higher volumes of real-time messages than standard synchronous callouts.
Option A (Apex Callouts) is a point-to-point, synchronous pattern that would block Case processing and risk hitting "Concurrent Long-Running Request" limits. Option B (Outbound Messaging) is reliable but is limited to a single object per message and uses a rigid SOAP format that is less flexible for ad-hoc external analytics than the modern JSON/CometD/gRPC structures used by the event bus. By implementing Option C, the architect ensures that every specific business milestone (refund, exchange, cancellation) is broadcasted immediately, providing the customer service director with the accurate, real-time visibility required for trending and metrics.
NEW QUESTION # 59
An integration architect needs to build a solution that will use the Streaming API, but the data loss should be minimized, even when the client re-connects every couple of days. Which two types of Streaming API events should be considered?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In a robust event-driven architecture, "durability" is the ability of a system to retain events so that a subscriber can retrieve them even after being offline. For an architect needing to minimize data loss over "every couple of days," the selection must focus on event types that support a high retention window.
Salesforce provides two modern event types specifically designed for high-scale, durable messaging:
Change Data Capture (CDC): This automatically broadcasts changes to Salesforce records (Create, Update, Delete, Undelete). CDC events are highly durable and are retained in the event bus for 72 hours (3 days).
High-Volume Platform Events: These are custom events defined by the architect. Like CDC, High-Volume Platform Events also provide a 72-hour retention window.
Earlier versions of the Streaming API, such as PushTopic Events and Generic Events (Option C and parts of A), typically offered a 24-hour retention window, which would not satisfy the requirement of a client re-connecting "every couple of days" (potentially 48-72 hours later).
By utilizing CDC and High-Volume Platform Events, the architect can leverage the Replay ID. When the client re-connects, it can send the Replay ID of the last event it successfully processed. Salesforce then "replays" all events that occurred during the client's downtime from that specific point, up to the 72-hour limit. This mechanism ensures zero data loss for planned or unplanned outages lasting up to three days, making it the most resilient choice for the specified requirements.
NEW QUESTION # 60
A company uses Customer Community for course registration. The payment gateway takes more than 30 seconds to process transactions. Students want results in real time to retry if errors occur. What is the recommended integration approach?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Standard synchronous Apex callouts have a timeout limit, and more importantly, Salesforce limits the number of long-running requests (those lasting longer than 5 seconds) that can execute concurrently. If a payment gateway consistently takes 30 seconds, a few simultaneous users could easily exhaust the org's concurrent request limit, causing the entire system to stop responding.
The Continuation pattern (Option C) is designed specifically for this "long-wait" scenario. It allows the Apex request to be suspended while waiting for the external service to respond, freeing up the Salesforce worker thread to handle other users. Once the gateway responds, the suspended process resumes and returns the result to the student's browser. This provides the "real-time" experience required for the student to retry immediately without the risk of bringing down the entire community due to thread exhaustion.
NEW QUESTION # 61
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to secure an integration with an external Microsoft Azure API Gateway. Which integration security mechanism should be employed?
Answer: B
Explanation:
For outbound integrations from Salesforce to an external cloud gateway like Microsoft Azure API Gateway, securing the communication at the transport layer is a fundamental requirement. While standard SSL provides one-way encryption where the client (Salesforce) verifies the server (Azure), Mutual Server Authentication (Two-Way SSL/TLS) ensures that both parties are verified before data is exchanged.
In this architecture, Salesforce presents a digital certificate to the Azure API Gateway during the TLS handshake. For production environments, Salesforce architects recommend using certificates signed by a Certification Authority (CA) rather than self-signed certificates to establish a trusted chain of identity that complies with enterprise security standards. This mechanism prevents unauthorized clients from connecting to the Azure endpoint, effectively mitigating man-in-the-middle attacks and unauthorized data exfiltration.
While a Connected App and OAuth (Option B) are essential for inbound requests where external systems call Salesforce, they do not natively secure the point-to-point connection when Salesforce acts as the client. Similarly, a federated API access model (Option A) focuses on user identity but does not address the transport layer security between the two cloud platforms. By configuring two-way SSL, Northern Trail Outfitters ensures that the Azure API Gateway only processes requests originating from a trusted, authenticated Salesforce instance, fulfilling the high security and trust requirements of modern integration architecture.
NEW QUESTION # 62
......
Plat-Arch-204 Exam Actual Tests: https://www.actualtestsquiz.com/Plat-Arch-204-test-torrent.html
What's more, part of that ActualTestsQuiz Plat-Arch-204 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YMou9XcgQBm9oK8eJ-QRkGeKpV9gxkM0