Jpshikenは、AZ-802の実際のテストの品質を非常に重視しています。 すべての製品は厳格な検査プロセスを受けます。 さらに、さまざまな種類のAZ-802学習資料間でランダムチェックが行われます。 AZ-802学習教材の品質はあなたの信頼に値します。 試験を準備するための最も重要なことは、重要なポイントを確認することです。 優れたAZ-802試験問題により、合格率は他の受験者よりもはるかに高くなっています。 AZ-802のAdministering Windows Server試験の準備にはショートカットがあります。
| Section | Objectives |
|---|---|
| Topic 1: Networking and high availability | - Networking infrastructure
|
| Topic 2: Hybrid infrastructure management | - Azure integration
|
| Topic 3: Compute, storage, and virtualization | - Virtual machines and containers
|
| Topic 4: Secure and manage Windows Server environments | - Identity and access management
|
このほど、今のIT会社は多くのIT技術人材を急速に需要して、あなたはこのラッキーな人になりたいですか？MicrosoftのAZ-802試験に参加するのはあなたに自身のレベルを高めさせるだけでなく、あなたがより良く就職し輝かしい未来を持っています。弊社JpshikenはMicrosoftのAZ-802問題集を購入し勉強した後、あなたはAZ-802試験に合格することでできると信じています。
質問 # 296
You need to ensure that data availability on SSPace1 meets the technical requirements. What is the maximum number of physical disks that can fail on each disk without losing data? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Disk1: 2. Disk2: 1.
The requirement is that data on SSPace1 must remain available at all times, meaning the storage pool ' s virtual disks must be able to tolerate physical disk failures without becoming unavailable or losing data. A three-way mirror keeps three copies of every block of data spread across different physical disks, so it remains available and readable even if any two of those disks fail simultaneously; the resiliency is fixed at tolerating two failures regardless of how many total disks (8, in Disk1 ' s case) make up the pool, as long as there are enough disks to support three-way mirroring, which eight comfortably provides. Disk2 uses parity resiliency, which stores a single parity block that can reconstruct data after one physical disk failure; unless dual parity is explicitly configured (which requires being set at virtual disk creation time and is not indicated here), a standard parity virtual disk tolerates only one physical disk failure before data becomes unavailable, regardless of the pool having twelve physical disks. Administrators sometimes assume more disks in a parity pool automatically means more fault tolerance, but the number of disks a parity space can lose is determined by the resiliency configuration (single vs. dual parity), not by the total disk count. Therefore Disk1 tolerates two disk failures and Disk2 tolerates one.
質問 # 297
Your network contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) domain named.
The domain contains a user named User1 and two global security groups named Group! and Group2. User1 is a member of both groups.
A Group Policy Object (GPO) named GP01 is linked to the domain. GP01 contains the following User Configuration preference items.
For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
Statement 1: No. Statement 2: Yes. Statement 3: Yes.
The Drive Maps item targets Group1 AND an IP address range of 10.10.0.0 through 10.10.255.255, and both conditions of an AND-joined target must be true for the item to apply; 10.20.5.20 falls outside that 10.10.0.0-
10.10.255.255 range, so the IP condition fails regardless of Group1 membership, and drive S is not mapped, making statement 1 false. The same Drive Maps item has Remove this item when it is no longer applied selected, meaning that whenever the item ' s targeting later evaluates to false for a user who previously received the mapping, the client-side extension actively removes the previously applied drive mapping on the next Group Policy refresh; removing User1 from Group1 breaks the AND condition (Group1 AND IP range) going forward, so on the next sign-in the item ' s targeting fails and the drive mapping is removed, meaning the user will NOT have drive S, making statement 2 true. The Shortcuts item targets Group2 OR the local file
' s existence, and since User1 remains a member of Group2 regardless of the local file ' s presence, the OR condition is satisfied purely by group membership even on a computer lacking the local file, so the shortcut is applied; because Apply once and do not reapply is selected for Shortcuts, the client-side extension creates it a single time and then never re-evaluates or recreates it again on that computer, even across later sign-ins or policy refreshes, making statement 3 true.
質問 # 298
Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution. After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen. You have a failover cluster named Cluster1 that hosts an application named App1. The General tab in App1 Properties is shown in the General exhibit: Preferred Owners lists Server1 and Server2, both unchecked, with the Up/Down reordering controls disabled; Priority is Medium; the role is Running on Server2. The Failover tab in App1 Properties is shown in the Failover exhibit: Maximum failures in the specified period is 3, Period (hours) is 6, and Failback is currently set to " Allow failback " / " Immediately. " Server1 shuts down unexpectedly. You need to ensure that when you start Server1, App1 continues to run on Server2. Solution:
You increase Maximum failures in the specified period for the App1 cluster role. Does this meet the goal?
App1 Properties - General tab
App1 Properties - Failover tab
正解：B
解説：
The " Maximum failures in the specified period " setting on the Failover tab controls how many times the Cluster service will attempt to restart or move a clustered role within a rolling time window before giving up and leaving that role in a failed state -- it governs retry behavior after repeated failures of the role itself, not whether a role fails back to a node that has just come back online. The Failback setting shown on the same tab, currently " Allow failback " / " Immediately, " is the setting that actually controls return-to-preferred- owner behavior, and increasing the failure-count threshold does nothing to change that Failback configuration. Because App1 ' s Failback setting remains " Allow failback, " App1 would still automatically move back to Server1 as soon as Server1 restarts and a preferred owner order caused it to be favored, regardless of how high the maximum-failures threshold is set. Increasing this value therefore has no effect on preventing App1 from returning to Server1 once Server1 restarts, so this solution does not meet the goal.
質問 # 299
Your network contains two Active Directory forests and a domain trust as shown in the following exhibit:
contoso.com forest contains a child domain east.contoso.com (automatic parent-child trust); a separate domain trust named adatum.com exists, configured as Type External, Direction One-way outgoing (outgoing from east.contoso.com to adatum.com), Outgoing trust authentication level Domain-wide authentication. The network contains the users User1 (adatum.com), User2 (contoso.com), and User3 (east.contoso.com), and the shares Share1 (in adatum.com), Share2 (in contoso.com), and Share3 (in east.contoso.com). For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is true. Otherwise, select No. NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.
contoso.com (parent-child trust) east.contoso.com; east.contoso.com --external, one-way outgoing domain trust-- > adatum.com.
User1: adatum.com. User2: contoso.com. User3: east.contoso.com.
正解：
解説：
Explanation:
User1 can be assigned permissions for Share3: Yes. User2 can be assigned permissions for Share1: No. User3 can be assigned permissions for Share1: No.
The external trust here is configured on east.contoso.com, directed one-way outgoing toward adatum.com; an outgoing trust means the domain that owns the trust (east.contoso.com) trusts the named target domain (adatum.com), which allows security principals from the trusted domain, adatum.com, to be granted access to resources in the trusting domain, east.contoso.com - but grants nothing in the reverse direction, and, being an external (not forest) trust, it is non-transitive and does not extend to any other domain such as the contoso.
com root. User1 belongs to adatum.com, the trusted domain, and Share3 sits in east.contoso.com, the trusting domain, so User1 can indeed be assigned permissions for Share3 - that is precisely what an outgoing trust from east.contoso.com to adatum.com enables. User2 belongs to contoso.com, the forest root, which is not a party to this external trust at all (the trust exists only on east.contoso.com, and external trusts don ' t extend automatically to a parent domain), so there is no path allowing User2 into adatum.com ' s Share1. User3 belongs to east.contoso.com itself, but the trust direction only lets adatum.com principals reach into east.
contoso.com, not the reverse; east.contoso.com does not trust adatum.com as a resource domain from its own users ' perspective, so User3 likewise cannot be assigned permissions for Share1.
質問 # 300
Your network contains an Active Directory Domain Services (AD DS) forest named contoso.com. The root domain contains the domain controllers shown in the following exhibit. A failure of which domain controller will prevent you from creating application partitions?
DC-to-FSMO-role mapping in the contoso.com forest root domain.
正解：B
解説：
Creating (or removing) an Active Directory application directory partition, such as the DomainDnsZones or ForestDnsZones partitions used by AD-integrated DNS, requires that the operation contact the domain naming master, one of the two forest-wide FSMO roles. The domain naming master enforces uniqueness of directory partition names across the entire forest, so any tool that creates a new application partition - including dcpromo/ntdsutil workflows and DNS zone creation that provisions an application partition - must be able to reach the current domain naming master role holder to complete the operation; if that role holder is offline, the creation fails. In the exhibit, DC1 holds the domain naming master role, so a failure of DC1 is what would block application partition creation. The other roles shown do not gate this specific operation: the RID master (DC2) only issues relative ID pools used when creating new security principals such as users, groups, and computers; the PDC emulator (DC3) handles time synchronization, password change urgency, and account lockout processing, among other domain-wide duties; the schema master (DC4) is required only when the schema itself is being extended or modified, not when a partition is created under the existing schema; and the infrastructure master (DC5) maintains cross-domain object reference consistency and is irrelevant to partition creation in a single-domain forest. Only the domain naming master ' s availability is a hard prerequisite for creating application partitions.
質問 # 301
......
我々Jpshikenは最高のアフターサービスを提供いたします。MicrosoftのAZ-802試験ソフトを買ったあなたは一年間の無料更新サービスを得られて、MicrosoftのAZ-802の最新の問題集を了解して、試験の合格に自信を持つことができます。あなたはMicrosoftのAZ-802試験に失敗したら、弊社は原因に関わらずあなたの経済の損失を減少するためにもらった費用を全額で返しています。
AZ-802日本語版受験参考書: https://www.jpshiken.com/AZ-802_shiken.html