–Efficient%20Test%20Simulator%20Free)
DOWNLOAD the newest TestPassKing Data-Engineer-Associate PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1moeiUt3NRMttH7FKt4tfHw-7ZHdmQL3f
Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate dumps PDF version is printable and embedded with valid Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate questions to help you get ready for the Data-Engineer-Associate exam quickly. AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) (Data-Engineer-Associate) exam dumps pdf are also usable on several smart devices. You can use it anywhere at any time on your smartphones and tablets.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Topic 1: Data Security and Governance | 18% | - Implement data security controls - Apply governance and compliance best practices |
| Topic 2: Data Ingestion and Transformation | 34% | - Ingest and transform data using AWS services - Build and manage data pipelines |
| Topic 3: Data Operations and Support | 22% | - Monitor and maintain data pipelines - Troubleshoot data workflow issues |
| Topic 4: Data Store Management | 26% | - Optimize storage performance and cost - Select appropriate data storage solutions |
>> Data-Engineer-Associate Test Simulator Free <<
Wondering where you can find the perfect materials for the exam? Don't leave your fate depending on thick books about the exam. Our authoritative AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate (DEA-C01) practice materials are licensed products. Whether newbie or experienced exam candidates you will be eager to have them. And they all made huge advancement after using them. So prepare to be amazed by our Data-Engineer-Associate practice materials. We can absolutely guarantee that even if the first time to take the exam, candidates can pass smoothly.
NEW QUESTION # 45
A company stores daily records of the financial performance of investment portfolios in .csv format in an Amazon S3 bucket. A data engineer uses AWS Glue crawlers to crawl the S3 data.
The data engineer must make the S3 data accessible daily in the AWS Glue Data Catalog.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: D
Explanation:
To make the S3 data accessible daily in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, the data engineer needs to create a crawler that can crawl the S3 data and write the metadata to the Data Catalog. The crawler also needs to run on a daily schedule to keep the Data Catalog updated with the latest data. Therefore, the solution must include the following steps:
Create an IAM role that has the necessary permissions to access the S3 data and the Data Catalog. The AWSGlueServiceRole policy is a managed policy that grants these permissions1.
Associate the role with the crawler.
Specify the S3 bucket path of the source data as the crawler's data store. The crawler will scan the data and infer the schema and format2.
Create a daily schedule to run the crawler. The crawler will run at the specified time every day and update the Data Catalog with any changes in the data3.
Specify a database name for the output. The crawler will create or update a table in the Data Catalog under the specified database. The table will contain the metadata about the data in the S3 bucket, such as the location, schema, and classification.
Option B is the only solution that includes all these steps. Therefore, option B is the correct answer.
Option A is incorrect because it configures the output destination to a new path in the existing S3 bucket. This is unnecessary and may cause confusion, as the crawler does not write any data to the S3 bucket, only metadata to the Data Catalog.
Option C is incorrect because it allocates data processing units (DPUs) to run the crawler every day. This is also unnecessary, as DPUs are only used for AWS Glue ETL jobs, not crawlers.
Option D is incorrect because it combines the errors of option A and C. It configures the output destination to a new path in the existing S3 bucket and allocates DPUs to run the crawler every day, both of which are irrelevant for the crawler.
References:
1: AWS managed (predefined) policies for AWS Glue - AWS Glue
2: Data Catalog and crawlers in AWS Glue - AWS Glue
3: Scheduling an AWS Glue crawler - AWS Glue
[4]: Parameters set on Data Catalog tables by crawler - AWS Glue
[5]: AWS Glue pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
NEW QUESTION # 46
A company stores sensitive data in an Amazon Redshift table. The company needs to give specific users the ability to access the sensitive data. The company must not create duplication in the data.
Customer support users must be able to see the last four characters of the sensitive data. Audit users must be able to see the full value of the sensitive data. No other users can have the ability to access the sensitive information.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: A
Explanation:
Amazon Redshift supportsdynamic data masking, which enables you to limit sensitive data visibility to specific users and roles without duplicating the data. This approach supports showing only parts of a column's values (e.g., last four digits) and full visibility for authorized roles (e.g., auditors).
"With dynamic data masking, you can control how much sensitive data a user sees in query results without changing the data in the table."
-Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf IAM roles are used to associate users with the appropriate masking rules, keeping security tight and avoiding the creation of duplicate data views or tables.
NEW QUESTION # 47
A company stores data from an application in an Amazon DynamoDB table that operates in provisioned capacity mode. The workloads of the application have predictable throughput load on a regular schedule.
Every Monday, there is an immediate increase in activity early in the morning. The application has very low usage during weekends.
The company must ensure that the application performs consistently during peak usage times.
Which solution will meet these requirements in the MOST cost-effective way?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides fast and predictable performance with seamless scalability. DynamoDB offers two capacity modes for throughput capacity:
provisioned and on-demand. In provisioned capacity mode, you specify the number of read and write capacity units per second that you expect your application to require. DynamoDB reserves the resources to meet your throughput needs with consistent performance. In on-demand capacity mode, you pay per request and DynamoDB scales the resources up and down automatically based on the actual workload. On-demand capacity mode is suitable for unpredictable workloads that can vary significantly over time1.
The solution that meets the requirements in the most cost-effective way is to use AWS Application Auto Scaling to schedule higher provisioned capacity for peak usage times and lower capacity during off-peak times. This solution has the following advantages:
* It allows you to optimize the cost and performance of your DynamoDB table by adjusting the provisioned capacity according to your predictable workload patterns. You can use scheduled scaling to specify the date and time for the scaling actions, and the new minimum and maximum capacity limits. For example, you can schedule higher capacity for every Monday morning and lower capacity for weekends2.
* It enables you to take advantage of the lower cost per unit of provisioned capacity mode compared to on-demand capacity mode. Provisioned capacity mode charges a flat hourly rate for the capacity you reserve, regardless of how much you use. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on-demand capacity mode1.
* It ensures that your application performs consistently during peak usage times by having enough capacity to handle the increased load. You can also use auto scaling to automatically adjust the provisioned capacity based on the actual utilization of your table, and set a target utilization percentage for your table or global secondary index. This way, you can avoid under-provisioning or over- provisioning your table2.
Option A is incorrect because it suggests increasing the provisioned capacity to the maximum capacity that is currently present during peak load times. This solution has the following disadvantages:
* It wastes money by paying for unused capacity during off-peak times. If you provision the same high capacity for all times, regardless of the actual workload, you are over-provisioning your table and paying for resources that you don't need1.
* It does not account for possible changes in the workload patterns over time. If your peak load times increase or decrease in the future, you may need to manually adjust the provisioned capacity to match the new demand. This adds operational overhead and complexity to your application2.
Option B is incorrect because it suggests dividing the table into two tables and provisioning each table with half of the provisioned capacity of the original table. This solution has the following disadvantages:
* It complicates the data model and the application logic by splitting the data into two separate tables.
You need to ensure that the queries are evenly distributed across both tables, and that the data is consistent and synchronized between them. This adds extra development and maintenance effort to your application3.
* It does not solve the problem of adjusting the provisioned capacity according to the workload patterns.
You still need to manually or automatically scale the capacity of each table based on the actual utilization and demand. This may result in under-provisioning or over-provisioning your tables2.
Option D is incorrect because it suggests changing the capacity mode from provisioned to on-demand. This solution has the following disadvantages:
* It may incur higher costs than provisioned capacity mode for predictable workloads. On-demand capacity mode charges for each read and write request you consume, with no minimum capacity required. For predictable workloads, provisioned capacity mode can be more cost-effective than on- demand capacity mode, as you can reserve the capacity you need at a lower rate1.
* It may not provide consistent performance during peak usage times, as on-demand capacity mode may take some time to scale up the resources to meet the sudden increase in demand. On-demand capacity mode uses adaptive capacity to handle bursts of traffic, but it may not be able to handle very large spikes or sustained high throughput. In such cases, you may experience throttling or increased latency.
References:
* 1: Choosing the right DynamoDB capacity mode - Amazon DynamoDB
* 2: Managing throughput capacity automatically with DynamoDB auto scaling - Amazon DynamoDB
* 3: Best practices for designing and using partition keys effectively - Amazon DynamoDB
* [4]: On-demand mode guidelines - Amazon DynamoDB
* [5]: How to optimize Amazon DynamoDB costs - AWS Database Blog
* [6]: DynamoDB adaptive capacity: How it works and how it helps - AWS Database Blog
* [7]: Amazon DynamoDB pricing - Amazon Web Services (AWS)
NEW QUESTION # 48
A company is building a data stream processing application. The application runs in an Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) cluster. The application stores processed data in an Amazon DynamoDB table.
The company needs the application containers in the EKS cluster to have secure access to the DynamoDB table. The company does not want to embed AWS credentials in the containers.
Which solution will meet these requirements?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In this scenario, the company is using Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS) and wants secure access to DynamoDB without embedding credentials inside the application containers. The best practice is to use IAM roles for service accounts (IRSA), which allows assigning IAM roles to Kubernetes service accounts. This lets the EKS pods assume specific IAM roles securely, without the need to store credentials in containers.
IAM Roles for Service Accounts (IRSA):
With IRSA, each pod in the EKS cluster can assume an IAM role that grants access to DynamoDB without needing to manage long-term credentials. The IAM role can be attached to the service account associated with the pod.
This ensures least privilege access, improving security by preventing credentials from being embedded in the containers.
Reference:
Alternatives Considered:
A (Storing AWS credentials in S3): Storing AWS credentials in S3 and retrieving them introduces security risks and violates the principle of not embedding credentials.
C (IAM user access keys in environment variables): This also embeds credentials, which is not recommended.
D (Kubernetes secrets): Storing user access keys as secrets is an option, but it still involves handling long-term credentials manually, which is less secure than using IRSA.
IAM Best Practices for Amazon EKS
Secure Access to DynamoDB from EKS
NEW QUESTION # 49
A company currently uses a provisioned Amazon EMR cluster that includes general purpose Amazon EC2 instances. The EMR cluster uses EMR managed scaling betweenone to five task nodes for the company's long- running Apache Spark extract, transform, and load (ETL) job. The company runs the ETL job every day.
When the company runs the ETL job, the EMR cluster quickly scales up to five nodes. The EMR cluster often reaches maximum CPU usage, but the memory usage remains under 30%.
The company wants to modify the EMR cluster configuration to reduce the EMR costs to run the daily ETL job.
Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectively?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The company's Apache Spark ETL job on Amazon EMR uses high CPU but low memory, meaning that compute-optimized EC2 instanceswould be the most cost-effective choice. These instances are designed for high-performance compute applications, where CPU usage is high, but memory needs are minimal, which is exactly the case here.
* Compute Optimized Instances:
* Compute-optimized instances, such as the C5 series, provide a higher ratio of CPU to memory, which is more suitable for jobs with high CPU usage and relatively low memory consumption.
* Switching from general-purpose EC2 instances to compute-optimized instances canreduce costs while improving performance, as these instances are optimized for workloads like Spark jobs that perform a lot of computation.
Reference:Amazon EC2 Compute Optimized Instances
Managed Scaling: The EMR cluster's scaling is currently managed between 1 and 5 nodes, so changing the instance type will leverage the current scaling strategy but optimize it for the workload.
Alternatives Considered:
A (Increase task nodes to 10): Increasing the number of task nodes would increase costs without necessarily improving performance. Since memory usageis low, the bottleneck is more likely the CPU, which compute- optimized instances can handle better.
B (Memory optimized instances): Memory-optimized instances are not suitable since the current job is CPU- bound, and memory usage remains low (under 30%).
D (Reduce scaling cooldown): This could marginally improve scaling speed but does not address the need for cost optimization and improved CPU performance.
References:
Amazon EMR Cluster Optimization
Compute Optimized EC2 Instances
NEW QUESTION # 50
......
TestPassKing provides updated and valid Amazon Exam Questions because we are aware of the absolute importance of updates, keeping in mind the Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Exam syllabus. We provide you update checks for 365 days after purchase for absolutely no cost. High-quality Amazon Data-Engineer-Associate Reliable Dumps torrent with reasonable price should be the best option for you.
Data-Engineer-Associate Examcollection Questions Answers: https://www.testpassking.com/Data-Engineer-Associate-exam-testking-pass.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of TestPassKing Data-Engineer-Associate dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1moeiUt3NRMttH7FKt4tfHw-7ZHdmQL3f