今の社会はますます激しく変化しているから、私たちはいつまでも危機意識を強化します。キャンパース内のIT知識を学ぶ学生なり、IT職人なり、NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6試験資格認証証明書を取得して、社会需要に応じて自分の能力を高めます。我々社は最高のFortinet NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6試験問題集を開発し提供して、一番なさービスを与えて努力しています。業界で有名なFortinet NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6問題集販売会社として、購入意向があると、我々の商品を選んでくださいませんか。
| トピック | 出題範囲 |
|---|---|
| トピック 1 |
|
| トピック 2 |
|
| トピック 3 |
|
| トピック 4 |
|
| トピック 5 |
|
FortinetのNSE4_FGT_AD-7.6資格認定証明書を持つ人は会社のリーダーからご格別のお引き立てを賜ったり、仕事の昇進をたやすくなったりしています。これなので、今から我々社It-PassportsのNSE4_FGT_AD-7.6試験に合格するのに努力していきます。弊社のFortinetのNSE4_FGT_AD-7.6真題によって、資格認定証明書を受け取れて、仕事の昇進を実現できます。
質問 # 76
Which two statements about equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) configuration on FortiGate are true? (Choose two answers)
正解：A、D
解説：
"If SD-WAN is disabled, you can change the ECMP load balancing algorithm on the FortiGate CLI using the commands shown on this slide."
"When SD-WAN is enabled, FortiOS hides the v4-ecmp-mode setting and replaces it with the load-balance-mode setting under config system sdwan. That is, when you enable SD-WAN, you control the ECMP algorithm with the load-balance-mode setting."
"There are some differences between the two settings. The main difference is that load-balance-mode supports the volume algorithm, and v4-ecmp-mode does not."
"These routes are called equal cost multipath (ECMP) routes..."
Technical Deep Dive:
The correct answers are A and D.
A is correct because when SD-WAN is enabled, FortiOS no longer uses v4-ecmp-mode; it uses load-balance-mode under config system sdwan. That is the explicit SD-WAN control point for ECMP behavior.
D is correct because when SD-WAN is disabled, ECMP configuration is done in the regular system routing settings, not under SD-WAN. The study guide states that you change the ECMP algorithm on the FortiGate CLI when SD-WAN is disabled, which corresponds to the classic config system settings ECMP controls.
Why the others are wrong:
B is wrong because the guide explicitly says load-balance-mode supports volume, while v4-ecmp-mode does not. So you cannot set v4-ecmp-mode to volume-based.
C is wrong because ECMP requires equal-cost routes. If distance or priority differ, they are no longer ECMP candidates; FortiGate selects the preferred route instead. The concept of ECMP itself requires equal route cost attributes.
From an implementation standpoint, the common CLI patterns are:
config system settings
set v4-ecmp-mode source-ip-based
end
and, with SD-WAN enabled:
config system sdwan
set load-balance-mode source-ip-based
end
On hardware platforms, ECMP still affects session distribution at the routing decision stage before later security services are applied. NP offload can accelerate forwarding after route selection, but the ECMP decision itself is a FortiOS control-plane routing function.
質問 # 77
Refer to the exhibit.
An administrator has created a new firewall address to use as the destination for a static route. Why is the administrator not able to select the new address in the Destination field of the new static route? (Choose one answer)
正解：C
解説：
"If you create a firewall address object with the type Subnet or FQDN, you can use that firewall address as the destination of one or more static routes. First, enable Routing configuration in the firewall address configuration. After you enable it, the firewall address object becomes available for use in the Destination drop-down list for static routes with named addresses." Technical Deep Dive:
The correct answer is D. The exhibit shows an FQDN address object (www.fortinet.com), but Routing configuration is disabled. FortiGate does not make that object available as a selectable destination for named static routes until this option is enabled.
Why the others are wrong:
A is incomplete. Even if the static route uses Named Address, the object still will not appear unless Routing configuration is enabled on the address object.
B is not the first requirement from the study guide. DNS resolution matters operationally for FQDN objects, but the documented reason it does not appear in the drop-down is the missing Routing configuration setting.
C is unrelated. The interface does not have to be set to port2 first just to make the address object selectable.
In practice, the fix is:
config firewall address
edit "Fortinet"
set type fqdn
set fqdn "www.fortinet.com"
set allow-routing enable
next
end
After that, the object becomes available in the static route Destination field when using a named address.
質問 # 78
Refer to the exhibits.
A web filter profile configuration and firewall policy configuration are shown.
You are trying to access www. facebook.com, but you are redirected to a FortiGuard web filtering block page.
Based on the exhibits, what is the possible cause of the issue?
正解：C
解説：
From the exhibits:
The Web Filter profile is configured with Feature set = Flow-based.
The Firewall policy is configured with Inspection mode = Proxy-based and has Web Filter enabled.
In FortiOS 7.6, security profiles that have a feature set selection (Flow-based vs Proxy-based) must match the inspection mode used by the firewall policy. If the profile's feature set does not match the policy's inspection mode, the profile behavior will not align with what the administrator expects (and in many cases FortiOS will prevent correct use/selection, or the feature behavior will not apply as intended).
That mismatch explains why the configured URL filter entry for www.facebook.com (set to Monitor) is not producing the expected result, and instead the session is being evaluated by category rating and blocked (shown as Malicious Websites on the FortiGuard block page).
Why the other options are not the best fit:
A: A web rating override is not shown in the exhibits, and nothing indicates an override misconfiguration.
C: While the policy inspection mode could be changed, the root cause shown is the profile feature set mismatch (profile is Flow-based).
D: The URL filter action shown is Monitor, which would not produce a block page by itself.
質問 # 79
Refer to the exhibits.
You are asked to implement an antivirus profile for files downloaded through FTP, HTTP, and HTTPS.
While testing, you are successful with HTTP and FTP protocols, but FortiGate does not block the file download over HTTPS.
What could be the cause?
正解：C
解説：
The SSL inspection mode in the firewall policy is set to certificate-inspection, which only examines SSL certificates without decrypting HTTPS traffic. Because of this, FortiGate cannot inspect or block files downloaded over HTTPS, as the content remains encrypted. To enable antivirus scanning on HTTPS traffic, the SSL inspection mode must be set to deep-inspection, allowing the FortiGate to decrypt, inspect, and re-encrypt the traffic.
質問 # 80
Refer to the exhibits.
A diagram of a FortiGate device connected to the network, as well as the firewall policy and IP pool configuration on the FortiGate device are shown.
Two PCs. PC1 and PC2, are connected behind FortiGate and can access the internet successfully. However, when the administrator adds a third PC to the network (PC3), the PC cannot connect to the internet.
Based on the information shown in the exhibit, which two configuration options can the administrator use to fix the connectivity issue for PC3? (Choose two.)
正解：A、D
解説：
From the exhibits:
The firewall policy has NAT enabled and is configured to Use Dynamic IP Pool.
The selected IP pool (Internet-pool) is configured as:
Type: One-to-One
External IP Range: 100.65.0.110-100.65.0.111 (only two public IPs)
PC1 and PC2 can access the internet because each one-to-one NAT mapping consumes one public IP from the pool. When PC3 is added, there is no third public IP available in the pool, so FortiGate cannot allocate a one- to-one mapping for PC3 and the session fails.
FortiOS behavior here is standard: with one-to-one IP pools, the available pool size limits how many distinct internal sources can be translated concurrently (depending on allocation and sessions), and a pool with only two IPs will not reliably support three separate hosts needing translations.
Therefore, the administrator can fix this in two valid ways:
B). In the IP pool configuration, set end ip to 100.65.0.112.
This expands the pool by adding an additional public IP address, making three public IPs available (.110, .
111, .112), so PC3 can be assigned an address for one-to-one NAT.
D). In the IP pool configuration, set type to overload.
Changing the pool type to overload enables PAT (many-to-one), allowing multiple internal hosts (PC1, PC2, PC3) to share the pool address(es) using different source ports. This removes the "one public IP per internal host" limitation inherent to one-to-one pools.
Why the other options are not correct:
A). Multiple Interface Policies is unrelated to IP pool exhaustion and does not solve NAT allocation limits.
C). match-vip affects VIP matching behavior for destination NAT/virtual IP usage and does not address the source NAT pool shortage causing PC3 to fail.
質問 # 81
......
アンケート調査によると、IT業種の皆さんが現在最も受験したい認定試験はFortinetのNSE4_FGT_AD-7.6試験だそうです。確かに、この試験はとても大切な試験で、公的に認可されたものです。しかも、この認定資格があなたが高い技能を身につけていることも証明できます。しかしながら、試験の大切さと同じ、この試験も非常に難しいです。試験に合格するのは少し大変ですが、心配しないでくださいよ。It-Passportsはあなたに難しいNSE4_FGT_AD-7.6認定試験に合格することを助けてあげますから。
NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6模擬試験最新版: https://www.it-passports.com/NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6.html