참고: DumpTOP에서 Google Drive로 공유하는 무료 2026 Salesforce NP-Con-102 시험 문제집이 있습니다: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rOTWKUPXdDfXM2WFZzr0ssnZzVbVgiu2
DumpTOP 에서 제공해드리는 Salesforce인증NP-Con-102시험덤프자료를 구입하시면 퍼펙트한 구매후 서비스를 약속드립니다. DumpTOP에서 제공해드리는 덤프는 IT업계 유명인사들이 자신들의 노하우와 경험을 토대로 하여 실제 출제되는 시험문제를 연구하여 제작한 최고품질의 덤프자료입니다. Salesforce인증NP-Con-102시험은DumpTOP 표Salesforce인증NP-Con-102덤프자료로 시험준비를 하시면 시험패스는 아주 간단하게 할수 있습니다. 구매하기전 PDF버전 무료샘플을 다운받아 공부하세요.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Solution Design | 32% | - Nonprofit Cloud Architecture
|
| Nonprofit Implementation Strategy | 11% | - Implementation Project Management
|
| Integration and Data Management | 20% | - System Integration
|
| Analytics and Reporting | 15% | - Data Insights
|
| Nonprofit Cloud Setup | 22% | - Feature Enablement
|
>> Salesforce NP-Con-102시험대비 덤프공부문제 <<
여러분은 먼저 우리 DumpTOP사이트에서 제공되는Salesforce인증NP-Con-102시험덤프의 일부분인 데모를 다운받으셔서 체험해보세요. DumpTOP는 여러분이 한번에Salesforce인증NP-Con-102시험을 패스하도록 하겠습니다. 만약Salesforce인증NP-Con-102시험에서 떨어지셨다고 하면 우리는 덤프비용전액 환불입니다.
질문 # 118
A Salesforce admin changes an Engagement Plan Template as requested by the development team. The development manager expects to see the changes reflected on an existing Engagement Plan using that Template on a campaign. Why is the development manager unable to see the Template changes?
정답：A
설명：
In NPSP, Engagement Plans are used to automate the creation of a set of tasks when a specific goal is identified (e.g., "Major Donor Stewardship"). It is critical to understand the relationship between the Template and the Instance.
The Logic of Decoupling:
* The Template: This is the "blueprint" that defines which tasks should be created, who should own them, and what their due dates are relative to the start date.
* The Engagement Plan (Instance): When a user applies a template to a Contact or Campaign, the system "explodes" the template and creates actual Task records and an Engagement Plan record.
* Persistence: Once those tasks are created, they become independent records. If an admin modifies the original Engagement Plan Template (e.g., adding a new task or changing a deadline), NPSP does not retroactively update existing tasks or plans that were already generated. This is intentional to prevent disrupting ongoing workflows or overwriting manual changes staff may have made to their active tasks.
* Result: Any modifications to the template will only be visible on new Engagement Plans created after the change was saved.
To update existing plans, the manager would have to delete the current Engagement Plan and re-apply the updated template, or manually add the new tasks to the current records.
질문 # 119
A nonprofit receives a donation from a family foundation. What should the consultant recommend to ensure the donation is reflected on the family's household record?
정답：B
설명：
In NPSP, we must distinguish between "Hard Credit" (legal ownership) and "Soft Credit" (influence
/relationship). When a family foundation (a Business Account) gives a donation, the Foundation gets the Hard Credit. However, the organization wants the Household Account (the family themselves) to receive credit for that gift in their "Total Giving" history.
The Solution: Account Soft Credits:
* Hard Credit: The Opportunity is created with the Family Foundation Account in the Account Name field. This is the legal donor.
* Soft Credit: To reflect this gift on the Family's Household, the consultant uses the Account Soft Credit feature.
* Relationship Tracking: A record is created in the Account Soft Credit related list on the Opportunity.
The "Account" is the Family's Household Account, and the "Role" is set to something like "Family Foundation."
* Rollups: NPSP's rollup engine will then pick up this soft credit. The family's Household record will now show this gift in fields like "Total Account Soft Credits" or "Total Gifts" (if the organization includes soft credits in their summary).
Why other options are incorrect:
* GAU Allocation (Option A): This tracks the fund or purpose of the money (e.g., "Building Fund"), not the donor or household credit.
* Lookup Fields (Options B & D): Adding custom lookup fields does not trigger NPSP's complex rollup logic. Only the standard Account Soft Credit object is recognized by the NPSP engine for aggregating influence-based giving to an account.
질문 # 120
The System Administrator at a nonprofit organization is assigning permission sets to users for the organization's new Nonprofit Cloud implementation. The organization needs some of its staff to have read- only access to the Fundraising and Grantmaking objects. What should the Administrator use to limit the access?
정답：C
설명：
With the release of the new Nonprofit Cloud, Salesforce has moved toward a "Permission Set-led" security model. This means that instead of relying on a few complex Profiles, Admins use Permission Set Groups to bundle various functional permissions (like Fundraising, Case Management, and Grantmaking).
In many scenarios, a consultant might find that a standard, "out-of-the-box" permission set provided by Salesforce grants a wide range of permissions (Create, Read, Edit, and Delete). If a specific group of users- such as interns or board members-needs to see that data but should not be allowed to change or delete it, the Administrator uses a Muting Permission Set.
How to Implement Muting:
* Create a Permission Set Group: The Admin creates a group called "Read-Only Fundraising Staff."
* Add the Standard Permission Set: The Admin adds the standard Fundraising Access permission set to the group. This initially grants full access.
* Add a Muting Permission Set: Within that same group, the Admin clicks "Muting Permission Set in Group" and creates a new one.
* Configure Muting: In the Muting Permission Set, the Admin navigates to the Object Settings for objects like Gift Commitment or Individual Application (Grantmaking). They check the "Muted" box for Create, Edit, and Delete.
* Assign the Group: When the group is assigned to users, the system calculates the "Final Effective Permissions" by taking the standard permissions and "muting" the ones specified. The result is a clean, read-only experience.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Restriction Rules (Option A) are used to limit which records a user can see based on specific criteria, not to change the level of access (Read vs. Edit) for an entire object.
* Sharing Rules (Option B) are used to open up access to records, not to limit the functional ability to Edit or Delete once a record is already visible.
질문 # 121
A board member introduced a high-net-worth individual to the work of the nonprofit. The individual made a donation at an event. The fundraising manager wants to record this information in Salesforce. It is important the donation is hard credited to the individual while ensuring this donation, as well as any future donations from the individual, are soft-credited to the board member. The board member and the individual already exist as contacts in Salesforce. How should the data be entered?
정답：C
설명：
This requirement involves two parts: a one-time transaction and an automated long-term "influence" tracking.
In NPSP, this is best accomplished by using the Relationship object's advanced soft-credit capabilities.
Step-by-Step Implementation:
* Define the Automated Soft Credit: The consultant should create a Relationship record between the Board Member and the Donor.
* Set the Related Opportunity Contact Role: On this Relationship record, there is a field called Related Opportunity Contact Role. The consultant should select Soft Credit (or a custom role like
"Solicitor").
* The Automation Logic: By setting this field on the relationship, NPSP's trigger framework is instructed that every time a donation is created where the donor is the "Primary Contact," the person on the other end of the relationship should automatically be added to that donation as an Opportunity Contact Role with the specified soft 3credit role.45
* Result: When the fundraiser creates the current donation, the board member is automatically soft- credited. For every future donation the do6nor makes, the system will continue to grant that soft credit automatically, satisfying th7e requirement to track all future gifts without manual intervention.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Option A and D: These suggest adding the soft credit manually to the current donation. While this works for the current gift, it does not address the "any future donations" requirement, which would require the fundraiser to remember to do it every single time.
* Option C: Partial Soft Credits are used for splitting gifts among multiple people (e.g., $50 to person A, $50 to person B). It is more complex than needed here and does not have the automated "future" triggering logic found in the Relationship-based soft credit model.
질문 # 122
A nonprofit organization provides funding to partners that work directly with the community to provide one- on-one nutritional counseling. The organization wants to make a dynamic, multi-section application that applicants can fill out on their Experience Cloud site to request funding. The organization plans to use the Form Overview and Form Review components included in the Grantmaking Experience Cloud template.
What should the organization do?
정답：B
설명：
To create a sophisticated, multi-section grant application in Nonprofit Cloud for Grantmaking, Salesforce leverages the Discovery Framework and Dynamic Assessments. This combination allows a consultant to build an interactive digital experience that goes far beyond simple data entry.
Step-by-Step Application Build:
* Discovery Framework: The consultant starts by creating the individual "Questions" in the Discovery Framework. Each question (e.g., "Number of individuals served" or "Geographic focus") is a reusable record.
* Assessment Definition: These questions are then organized into an Assessment Task or Assessment Definition.
* OmniScript Design: Using OmniStudio, the consultant builds an OmniScript that serves as the
"Dynamic Assessment" engine. This is where the multi-section logic is defined. For example, a
"Counseling Details" section might only appear if the applicant selects "One-on-one Counseling" as their service type.
* Mapping: Using DataRaptors, the data entered into the form is mapped directly to the Individual Application object and its related records (like Budget or Contact Profile).
* Experience Cloud Integration: Finally, the consultant places the Assessment component on the Grantmaking portal. The Form Overview and Form Review components (part of the Grantmaking template) work specifically with this Discovery Framework/OmniScript data to show the applicant their progress and allow them to review their answers before a final submission.
Why other options are incorrect:
* Option A: "Form Framework" is not a standard, named feature in NPC; the required technology is Discovery Framework.
* Option B: While Dynamic Forms (and Field Sets) work for internal record pages, they do not support the complex multi-step, branching logic or the specialized "Overview/Review" components required for a public-facing Grantmaking portal application. Using Discovery Framework is the architecturally correct way to provide a professional and compliant grant seeking experience.
질문 # 123
......
Salesforce NP-Con-102 시험이 어렵다고해도 DumpTOP의 Salesforce NP-Con-102시험잡이 덤프가 있는한 아무리 어려운 시험이라도 쉬워집니다. 어려운 시험이라 막무가내로 시험준비하지 마시고 문항수도 적고 모든 시험문제를 커버할수 있는Salesforce NP-Con-102자료로 대비하세요. 가장 적은 투자로 가장 큰 득을 보실수 있습니다.
NP-Con-102시험패스 인증덤프자료: https://www.dumptop.com/Salesforce/NP-Con-102-dump.html
DumpTOP NP-Con-102 최신 PDF 버전 시험 문제집을 무료로 Google Drive에서 다운로드하세요: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1rOTWKUPXdDfXM2WFZzr0ssnZzVbVgiu2