DOWNLOAD the newest ActualPDF 312-97 PDF dumps from Cloud Storage for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1a6651dZ_4FUsvczUxZU_ljB1vXeZIndH
It is known to us that more and more companies start to pay high attention to the 312-97 certification of the candidates. Because these leaders of company have difficulty in having a deep understanding of these candidates, may it is the best and fast way for all leaders to choose the excellent workers for their company by the 312-97 Certification that the candidates have gained. More and more workers have to spend a lot of time on meeting the challenge of gaining the 312-97 certification by sitting for an exam.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) Exam |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice Questions |
| Available Languages: | Simplified Chinese, Korean, Japanese, English |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Duration: | 240 minutes |
| Exam Price: | $550 USD |
| Recommended Training: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer Official Training |
| Exam Registration: | EC-Council Official Registration |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online via EC-Council Exam Portal or ECC Exam Center |
| Pre Condition: | 2 years of work experience in information security domain if not attending official training; $100 USD non-refundable application fee required |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/train-certify/certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde/ |
Test your knowledge of the 312-97 exam dumps with ActualPDF EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) practice questions. The software is designed to help with EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam dumps preparation. EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) practice test software can be used on devices that range from mobile devices to desktop computers. We provide the EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) (312-97) exam questions in a variety of formats, including a web-based practice test, desktop practice exam software, and downloadable PDF files.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 84
Kenneth Danziger is a certified DevSecOps engineer, and he recently got a job in an IT company that develops software products related to the healthcare industry. To identify security and compliance issues in the source code and quickly fix them before they impact the source code, Kenneth would like to integrate WhiteSource SCA tool with AWS. Therefore, to integrate WhiteSource SCA Tool in AWS CodeBuild for initiating scanning in the code repository, he built a buildspec.yml file to the source code root directory and added the following command to pre-build phase curl -LJO https://github.com/whitesource/unified-agent- distribution/raw/master/standAlone/wss_agent.sh. Which of the following script files will the above step download in Kenneth organization's CodeBuild server?
Answer: D
Explanation:
The command shown in the pre-build phase explicitly targets a script named wss_agent.sh. The curl - LJO flags mean: -L follows redirects, -J honors the server-provided filename in the Content- Disposition header (when present), and -O writes output to a local file using the remote name.
Since the requested path ends with wss_agent.sh, the downloaded file on the AWS CodeBuild server will be wss_agent.sh. This script is the WhiteSource (now commonly referred to as Mend in many environments) unified agent shell wrapper used to run SCA scans as part of a CI pipeline. Integrating SCA during the Build and Test stage helps detect vulnerable open-source dependencies and licensing/compliance issues early, when fixes are cheapest. The other filenames (ssw_agent.sh, cbs_agent.sh, aws_agent.sh) are distractors; they are not referenced by the provided command and would not be downloaded by that step.
NEW QUESTION # 85
Emma is a DevSecOps engineer at a software company that primarily develops Java-based applications. The development team frequently encounters inconsistent builds, dependency management issues, and difficulties in tracking project artifacts. Emma's project manager after consideration recommends using Apache Maven to be integrated to their project pipeline. Which of the following is the key advantage of using Apache Maven in a DevSecOps environment?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Apache Maven's key advantage is a structured, automated build lifecycle with centralized dependency management (via pom.xml and repositories), producing consistent, reproducible builds and traceable artifacts-directly solving Emma's inconsistent builds and dependency issues. Maven does not enforce API access control, replace CI/CD, or monitor runtime threats.
NEW QUESTION # 86
(DWART is an IT company that develops cyber security software and web applications. The organization ensures that all users should be identified and authorized, enforces proper auditing, secures data at rest, ensures that the attacker cannot bypass the security layers, implements multiple layers of defense, maintains proper data integrity, and performs proper input validation for the application. Based on the above-mentioned information, which of the following secure coding principles is achieved by DWART?.)
Answer: B
Explanation:
The practices described-user identification and authorization, auditing, defense-in-depth, data protection, integrity enforcement, and input validation-are core elements that are planned and architected into the system from the beginning. These controls reflectSecure by Design, which focuses on embedding security principles at the design and architecture stage rather than adding them later. Secure by implementation emphasizes coding correctness, secure by default focuses on default configurations, and secure by communication focuses on trusted communication channels. DWART's approach shows a holistic security mindset that anticipates attacker behavior and integrates layered defenses and controls into the system blueprint. This aligns directly with Secure by Design, which aims to reduce systemic risk by ensuring the application's foundational structure enforces security consistently across all components and use cases.
========
NEW QUESTION # 87
Oliver Bennett, a DevSecOps engineer at a London insurance firm, discovers that a base container image his team relies on has an outdated OpenSSL package with a known critical CVE.
He wants an automated scanner integrated into the Build stage to flag such OS-level package vulnerabilities in container images before they are pushed to the registry. Which tool category should Oliver use?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Container image vulnerability scanners such as Trivy, Clair, or Anchore inspect the layers of a container image, including the base OS packages and installed libraries, against known CVE databases, and can be integrated directly into the Build stage of a CI/CD pipeline to block or flag images before they reach the registry. This precisely matches Oliver's need to catch an outdated OpenSSL package with a known CVE pre-push. A Web Application Firewall protects a running web application at the network edge during Operate, not during image build. A Network Intrusion Detection System monitors network traffic for malicious activity in a live environment, not static image contents. A Git secret scanner detects hardcoded credentials in repository history, not OS package vulnerabilities. Because Oliver needs pre-push detection of vulnerable OS packages inside a container image, a container image vulnerability scanner is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 88
Isabela Marques, a DevSecOps engineer at a Porto software consultancy, wants developers to receive immediate feedback about newly introduced vulnerabilities directly within their pull request, before a reviewer even looks at the code, rather than waiting for a separate nightly scan report. What practice best achieves this?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Integrating SAST and SCA tools directly into the pull request CI workflow allows automated scans to run as soon as a PR is opened or updated, posting results and annotations inline before a human reviewer even examines the code, which provides the fast, "shift-left" feedback loop Isabela wants. Scheduling a weekly manual penetration test provides feedback far too infrequently and too late relative to individual pull requests. Waiting for production incident reports is entirely reactive and represents the latest, most costly point at which to discover a vulnerability.
Running scans only after each quarterly release delays feedback by months, defeating the purpose of continuous, rapid developer feedback. Since Isabela wants immediate, PR-level automated vulnerability feedback, integrating SAST/SCA into the PR CI workflow is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 89
......
312-97 Valid Examcollection: https://www.actualpdf.com/312-97_exam-dumps.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of ActualPDF 312-97 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1a6651dZ_4FUsvczUxZU_ljB1vXeZIndH