What's more, part of that Pass4Test 312-97 dumps now are free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12onIf4D98O0wz__vrJE6CaSqPrjuthIX
The software maintains track of prior tries and provides you with a self-assessment report indicating improvements in each attempt just like the online 312-97 practice test. You only practice with ECCouncil 312-97 Dumps Questions that are remarkably close to those that appear in the real exam. Team Pass4Test is committed to providing only updated ECCouncil 312-97 dumps questions to the users.
| Certification Vendor: | EC-Council |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer (ECDE) Exam |
| Exam Number: | 312-97 |
| Passing Score: | 70% |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Exam Price: | $550 USD |
| Exam Format: | Multiple Choice Questions |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Exam Duration: | 240 minutes |
| Available Languages: | Simplified Chinese, Korean, Japanese, English |
| Recommended Training: | EC-Council Certified DevSecOps Engineer Official Training |
| Exam Registration: | EC-Council Official Registration |
| Sample Questions: | ECCouncil 312-97 Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Online via EC-Council Exam Portal or ECC Exam Center |
| Pre Condition: | 2 years of work experience in information security domain if not attending official training; $100 USD non-refundable application fee required |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.eccouncil.org/train-certify/certified-devsecops-engineer-ecde/ |
>> 312-97 Authorized Test Dumps <<
With the pass rate of more than 98%, our 312-97 training materials have gained popularity in the market. We also pass guarantee and money back guarantee for you fail to pass the exam by using the 312-97 exam dumps, or you can replace other 2 valid exam dumps, at the same time, you can also get the free update for 312-97 Training Materials. In addition, we use the international recognition third party for payment, therefore your money safety id guaranteed. We support online payment with credit card.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
| Topic 6 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 56
Charles Rettig, a DevSecOps engineer at an IT company specializing in IoT software and web applications, is responsible for ensuring the security of web applications deployed across various devices. To automate security testing, Charles integrates Burp Suite with Jenkins using the Command Line Interface (CLI) to Identify vulnerabilities in web applications. During a security audit, Charles realizes that traditional security scanning approaches often produce false positives and fail to detect vulnerabilities that only appear during real-time interactions. To address this issue, he enables a Burp Suite feature that minimizes false positives. Which Burp Suite feature helps Charles detect invisible vulnerabilities while minimizing false positives?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Burp Suite's OAST (Out-of-band Application Security Testing, via Burp Collaborator) detects 'invisible' vulnerabilities-those that trigger no visible response, like blind SSRF or asynchronous injection-by capturing out-of-band interactions, dramatically reducing false positives. QAST, BAST, and FAST are not real Burp Suite features.
NEW QUESTION # 57
(Debra Aniston has recently joined an MNC company as a DevSecOps engineer. Her organization develops various types of software products and web applications. The DevSecOps team leader provided an application code and asked Debra to detect and mitigate security issues. Debra used w3af tool and detected cross-site scripting and SQL injection vulnerability in the source code. Based on this information, which category of security testing tools is represented by w3af?.)
Answer: C
Explanation:
w3af (Web Application Attack and Audit Framework) is aDynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tool. It analyzes running web applications by sending crafted requests and observing responses to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and authentication flaws. Unlike SAST tools, w3af does not require access to source code and instead operates externally, simulating real-world attack behavior.
SCA focuses on third-party dependencies, and IAST requires runtime instrumentation within the application.
Since Debra detected vulnerabilities by actively interacting with the application, w3af clearly represents DAST. DAST tools are especially valuable during the Build and Test stage, as they validate application behavior from an attacker's perspective before deployment.
========
NEW QUESTION # 58
(SNF Pvt. Ltd. is a software development company located in Denver, Colorado. The organization is using pytm, which is a Pythonic Framework for threat modeling, to detect security issues and mitigate them in advance. James Harden has been working as a DevSecOps engineer at SNF Pvt. Ltd. for the past 3 years. He has created a tm.py file that describes an application in which the user logs the app and posts the comments on the applications. These comments are stored by the application server in the database and AWS lambda cleans the database. Which of the following command James can use to generate a sequence diagram?)
Answer: D
Explanation:
The pytm framework generates threat models that can be visualized using PlantUML diagrams. To create a sequence diagram, the --seq option is used with the model file, and the output is piped to the PlantUML processor. The correct command must reference the correct Java system property -Djava.awt.headless=true, which allows diagram rendering in environments without a graphical interface, such as CI/CD pipelines.
Additionally, the correct jar file name is plantuml.jar. Options using lowercase -d instead of uppercase -D are invalid, and commands referencing plantum.jar are incorrect due to a misspelled jar name. Generating sequence diagrams during the Plan stage helps DevSecOps teams visualize data flows, understand attacker paths, and identify security threats early in the application design phase.
========
NEW QUESTION # 59
Diego Ramirez, a DevSecOps engineer at a Buenos Aires payments company, wants to make sure his organization can prove, months later, exactly which commit, which pipeline run, and which approver led to a specific artifact being deployed to production - supporting both security investigations and compliance audits. Which practice provides this end-to-end traceability?
Answer: D
Explanation:
Build and deployment provenance tracking captures verifiable metadata at each pipeline stage -- including the exact source commit, build system, test results, and approver identities -- and links that metadata to the resulting artifact, enabling teams to trace a production deployment back to its complete origin chain months later for security investigations or compliance audits, which is exactly what Diego needs. Increasing pipeline parallelism improves build speed and throughput but has no bearing on traceability or provenance data. Reducing the number of environments to just production would eliminate staging and testing safeguards entirely and does not address traceability. Disabling pipeline logging to save storage costs would directly destroy the very audit trail Diego needs, making it the opposite of a correct solution. Since Diego needs verifiable, end- to-end origin tracking for deployed artifacts, build and deployment provenance tracking is correct.
NEW QUESTION # 60
Jason Barry has been working as a DevSecOps engineer in an IT company that develops software products and applications for ecommerce companies. During the build-time check, Jason discovered SQL injection and XXS security issues in the application code. What action does the build-time check perform on the application code?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Build-time checks are designed to enforce security gates within the CI/CD pipeline. When critical vulnerabilities such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) are detected during this stage, the correct and expected behavior is to fail the build. Stopping the build process prevents insecure code from progressing to later stages such as testing, deployment, or production.
Ignoring issues or merely sending alerts while continuing the pipeline undermines the purpose of shift-left security. Alerts to SIEM systems and issue trackers are typically supplementary actions, but the primary enforcement mechanism at build time is to block the pipeline when severity thresholds are exceeded. This approach reduces remediation costs, limits exposure, and ensures that only secure artifacts move forward in the DevSecOps lifecycle.
NEW QUESTION # 61
......
Latest 312-97 Braindumps Free: https://www.pass4test.com/312-97.html
BTW, DOWNLOAD part of Pass4Test 312-97 dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=12onIf4D98O0wz__vrJE6CaSqPrjuthIX