SAVE International CVS 시험탈락시SAVE International CVS덤프비용전액을 환불해드릴만큼 저희 덤프자료에 자신이 있습니다. Itcertkr에서는SAVE International CVS덤프를 항상 최신버전이도록 보장해드리고 싶지만SAVE International CVS시험문제변경시점을 예측할수 없어 시험에서 불합격받을수도 간혹 있습니다. 하지만 시험에서 떨어지면 덤프비용을 전액 환불해드려 고객님의 이익을 보장해드립니다.
| Section | Weight | Objectives |
|---|---|---|
| Value Methodology Principles and Concepts | 25% | - Definition and core concepts of Value - Value index, function and cost relationship - Origins, development and application scope of Value Methodology |
| Leadership and Facilitation | 15% | - Stakeholder management and communication - Workshop facilitation skills - Leading value study teams |
| Tools and Techniques | 20% | - Decision-making and evaluation tools - Creative thinking and idea generation methods - Cost analysis and worth assessment - Function analysis system technique (FAST) |
| Value Methodology Job Plan | 30% | - Preparation phase - Function analysis phase - Creative phase - Development phase - Presentation and implementation phase - Information phase - Evaluation phase |
| Standards, Ethics and Application | 10% | - Professional ethics and responsibilities - SAVE International standards and guidelines - Application in different industries and sectors |
>> SAVE International CVS최신시험후기 <<
Itcertkr는 모든 IT관련 인증시험자료를 제공할 수 있는 사이트입니다. 우리Itcertkr는 여러분들한테 최고 최신의 자료를 제공합니다. Itcertkr을 선택함으로 여러분은 이미SAVE International CVS시험을 패스하였습니다. 우리 자료로 여러분은 충분히SAVE International CVS를 패스할 수 있습니다. 만약 시험에서 떨어지셨다면 우리는 백프로 환불은 약속합니다. 그리고 갱신이 된 최신자료를 보내드립니다. 하지만 이런사례는 거이 없었습니다.모두 한번에 패스하였기 때문이죠. Itcertkr는 여러분이SAVE International CVS인증시험 패스와 추후사업에 모두 도움이 되겠습니다. Pass4Tes의 선택이야말로 여러분의 현명한 선택이라고 볼수 있습니다. Pass4Tes선택으로 여러분은 시간도 절약하고 돈도 절약하는 일석이조의 득을 얻을수 있습니다. 또한 구매후 일년무료 업데이트버전을 바을수 있는 기회를 얻을수 있습니다.
질문 # 33
Unwanted functions
Choose 3 answers.
정답：A,B,C
설명：
The correct answers are A, C, and E . In Value Methodology, an unwanted function is a negative or undesirable function created by the selected design approach, process method, or operating solution. The SAVE glossary defines an unwanted function as one identified by the customer, user, or stakeholder as undesirable and caused by the approach used to achieve the subject's purpose. The SAVE Value Methodology Standard similarly classifies it as a negative secondary function caused by the method used to achieve the basic function, such as heat generated by lighting that then requires cooling. ( UW Courses ) Therefore, C is correct because unwanted functions are typically byproducts of how another required or basic function is performed. A is correct because these negative functions can reduce performance, quality, reliability, safety, or user satisfaction. E is correct because unwanted functions consume resources through added mitigation, maintenance, energy, rework, or corrective measures.
Option D is incorrect because Value Index is used broadly in Function Analysis to compare cost and worth and select improvement opportunities, not to define unwanted functions. ( UW Courses ) Option B is too broad; unwanted functions may become targets for elimination, but that is not their defining characteristic.
References/topics: Function Analysis Phase; Function Classification; Secondary Functions; Unwanted Functions; Function Cost and Worth.
질문 # 34
The VM study team appears engaged but is not making progress. Which of the following is the most likely cause?
정답：A
설명：
The correct answer is A. Groupthink . In VM facilitation, a team can appear active, cooperative, and verbally engaged while still failing to make meaningful progress if members are converging too quickly, avoiding disagreement, or reinforcing the same assumptions. This is characteristic of groupthink , where apparent harmony masks weak analysis and limited challenge to alternatives. Groupthink is defined as a negative group decision process involving conformity pressure, self-censorship, and reduced critical examination in cohesive groups.
This aligns directly with VM team-dynamics responsibilities. The SAVE International Study Guide states that the Job Plan supports team synergy within a structured process , not merely a collection of individual opinions. ( ) The team leader must keep the team focused, keep members involved in discussion and work, and act as a catalyst to keep the team moving and motivated. ( ) Option B would more likely produce visible discomfort or withdrawal. Option C, social loafing, reflects reduced individual effort, not an engaged but stalled team. Option D may influence participation, but it is not the best diagnostic cause here. The facilitation response should restore inquiry, challenge assumptions, and encourage constructive dissent.
References/topics: VM Facilitation and Team Dynamics; Team Leader Responsibilities; Job Plan Discipline; Groupthink; Team Progress Barriers.
질문 # 35
Which of the following actions should be taken to develop a comprehensive and effective VM study report?
Choose 2 answers.
정답：A,D
설명：
The correct answers are A. List VM proposals developed and C. Focus the report on the major VM proposals .
In the Presentation Phase, the VM study report must document the results of the study in a clear, decision- oriented format. The report should identify the VM proposals developed during the Development Phase, including the recommended change, basis of comparison, cost effect, value improvement, advantages, disadvantages, and implementation considerations. Listing the developed proposals gives decision makers a complete record of the team's actionable outputs.
However, an effective report should not become a raw archive of every discussion, idea, or technical detail. It should focus attention on the major VM proposals that offer meaningful value improvement and require management review or approval. This aligns with the Presentation Phase purpose: to communicate developed alternatives clearly and obtain concurrence for implementation.
Option B is less appropriate because the methodology may be summarized, but an overly detailed methodology section can distract from the proposals and decisions required. Option D is incorrect because technical terminology should be controlled and audience-appropriate; excessive jargon weakens communication.
References/topics: Presentation Phase; VM Study Report; Development Phase; VM Proposals; Decision- Maker Communication.
질문 # 36
What are key reasons to use a fine evaluation filter?
Choose 2 answers.
정답：B,D
설명：
The correct answers are A and C . A fine evaluation filter is used in the Evaluation Phase when the VM team needs a more disciplined and defensible method for screening ideas before selecting them for development.
SAVE's VM Job Plan states that evaluation factors and their relative importance should be agreed upon before ideas are evaluated, and that ideas are then ranked and rated against the most important evaluation criteria.
Option A is correct because the fine filter applies weighted relative importance to evaluation criteria. This prevents all criteria from being treated equally when some factors, such as cost, performance, risk, schedule, or customer impact, are more important than others. Option C is correct because this method increases rigor by moving the team from informal opinion to structured comparison. It supports rational selection of ideas for development and reduces bias, popularity-based decisions, and premature rejection of valuable alternatives.
Option B is incorrect because the purpose is not to slow the process or promote initial ideas. Option D may be a result of scoring, but it is not the primary distinguishing reason for using the fine filter.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Fine Evaluation Filter; Weighted Criteria; Ranking and Rating Ideas; Selection for Development.
질문 # 37
Which of the following actions would be appropriate for creating an effective evaluation framework?
Choose 2 answers.
정답：A,D
설명：
The correct answers are B and D . An effective evaluation framework in Value Methodology must be structured, objective, and aligned with the subject's purpose. The SAVE Value Methodology Standard describes the Evaluation Phase as the point where the team follows a structured process to select ideas with value-improvement potential while delivering required functions and considering performance requirements and resource limits. ( ) Therefore, the facilitator and team must first define clear objectives and success criteria that align with the study subject's goals. Evaluation cannot be based on preference alone; criteria should connect to function, performance, cost, schedule, risk, quality, user needs, and implementation feasibility. Involving stakeholders is also appropriate because stakeholders help confirm whether the evaluation criteria reflect actual project, customer, owner, or user priorities. Their participation improves acceptance of selected ideas and reduces resistance during later development and implementation.
Option A is incorrect because the Creativity Phase is intended for generating ideas, not judging them.
Introducing evaluation too early suppresses divergent thinking. Option C is incorrect because a "gut feel index" is informal and subjective, while VM requires disciplined, traceable evaluation methods.
References/topics: Evaluation Phase; Evaluation Criteria; Stakeholder Engagement; VM Job Plan; Structured Idea Screening.
질문 # 38
......
Itcertkr는 유일하게 여러분이 원하는SAVE International인증CVS시험관련자료를 해결해드릴 수 잇는 사이트입니다. Itcertkr에서 제공하는 자료로 응시는 문제없습니다, 여러분은 고득점으로 시험을 통과할 것입니다.
CVS최신 업데이트버전 덤프공부자료: https://www.itcertkr.com/CVS_exam.html