Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungsfrage, Plat-Arch-204 Vorbereitungsfragen

Laden Sie die neuesten DeutschPrüfung Plat-Arch-204 PDF-Versionen von Prüfungsfragen kostenlos von Google Drive herunter: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1S380-X6m63qMlxzC1ra5_sMglJgNDGVv

Wollen Sie Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen und auch die Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierung besitzen? Wir DeutschPrüfung können Ihren Erfolg gewährleisten. Es ist sehr wichtig, die entsprechenden Kenntnisse der Plat-Arch-204 Prüfung vorzubereiten. Und es ist auch sehr wichtig, das geeignete hocheffektive Gerät zu benutzen. Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Dumps von DeutschPrüfung sind unbedingt das beste Lerngerät, das geeignet für Sie ist. Sie können auch unglaubliche Ergebnisse von diesen hocheffektiven Dumps gefunden. Fürchten Sie sich Misserfolg der Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungen, klicken Sie bitte DeutschPrüfung und Informieren Sie sich.

Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Exam Overview:

Certification Vendor:	Salesforce
Exam Name:	Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Exam
Exam Number:	Plat-Arch-204
Available Languages:	English
Related Certifications:	Salesforce Certified Integration Architect Salesforce Certified Sharing and Visibility Architect Salesforce Certified Application Architect Salesforce Certified Data Architect Salesforce Certified System Architect
Passing Score:	Approximately 58%
Real Exam Qty:	Approximately 60 questions
Exam Price:	USD 400
Exam Duration:	105 minutes
Exam Format:	Multiple Select, Multiple Choice
Certificate Validity Period:	Maintained with annual certification maintenance requirements (no fixed expiration if maintained)
Recommended Training:	Integration Architecture Designer Modules Salesforce Trailhead Integration Architect Learning Path
Exam Registration:	Salesforce Certification Registration Webassessor (Kryterion exam delivery)
Sample Questions:	Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Sample Questions
Exam Way:	Online proctored or onsite testing center (varies by region and provider availability)
Pre Condition:	Recommended prerequisite: Salesforce Certified Application Architect and Salesforce Certified System Architect (part of the Salesforce Certified Technical Architect track is strongly recommended).
Official Syllabus URL:	https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/credentials/platformintegrationarchitect

>> Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungsfrage <<

Echte und neueste Plat-Arch-204 Fragen und Antworten der Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung

Wenn Sie sich noch anstrengend um die Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung bemühen, dann kann DeutschPrüfung in diesem Moment Ihnen helfen, Problem zu lösen. DeutschPrüfung bietet Ihnen Schulungsunterlagen von hoher Qualität, damit Sie die Prüfung bestehen und exzellentes Mitglied der Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierung werden können. Wenn Sie sich entscheiden, durch die Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung sich zu verbessern, dann wählen Sie bitte DeutschPrüfung. DeutschPrüfung zu wählen ist keinesfalls nicht falsch. Unser DeutschPrüfung verspricht, dass Sie beim ersten Versuch die Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen und somit das Zertifikat bekommen können. So können Sie sich sicher verbessern.

Salesforce Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungsplan:

Thema	Einzelheiten
Thema 1	Maintain Integration: This domain focuses on monitoring integration performance, defining error handling and recovery procedures, implementing escalation processes, and establishing reporting needs for ongoing integration health monitoring.
Thema 2	Design Integration Solutions: This domain centers on selecting integration patterns, designing complete solutions with appropriate components, understanding trade-offs and limitations, choosing correct Salesforce APIs, and determining required standards and security mechanisms.
Thema 3	Evaluate Business Needs: This domain addresses gathering functional and non-functional requirements, classifying data by sensitivity, identifying CRM success factors, and understanding how business growth and regulations impact integration choices.
Thema 4	Evaluate the Current System Landscape: This domain covers analyzing existing technical environments to understand current systems, their standards, protocols, limitations, and boundaries, while identifying constraints and authentication authorization requirements.

Salesforce Certified Platform Integration Architect Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q80-Q85):

80. Frage
Northern Trail Outfitters needs a low-code, near real-time REST integration to an ERP when an Order is created. They have limited development resources. Which option should fulfill the use case requirements?

A. Implement Change Data Capture on the Order object and leverage the replay ID in the middleware solution.
B. Implement a Workflow Rule with Outbound Messaging to send SOAP messages to the designated endpoint.
C. Use Lightning Flow to create a platform event, selecting the record type as the platform event name on insert of record.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
For a team with limited development resources and a low-code requirement, Lightning Flow (Flow Builder) is the primary declarative engine for modern integrations.
In this scenario, creating a Platform Event via a record-triggered flow provides a highly scalable, near real-time "Fire-and-Forget" signal to the middleware. This is considered low-code because it can be built entirely using point-and-click tools within Salesforce. Once the Order is created, the flow publishes the event to the bus. The middleware, acting as a subscriber, receives the event and orchestrates the REST call to the ERP.
Option C (Outbound Messaging) is also a low-code tool, but it natively sends messages in SOAP format. Since the ERP requires a REST endpoint, using Outbound Messaging would necessitate additional transformation logic in the middleware, making it a less efficient architectural choice than using a Flow to trigger an event or an External Service. Option B (Change Data Capture) is a powerful tool but often requires more advanced "pro-code" configuration on the subscriber/middleware side to handle Replay IDs and Bayeux protocols, which might exceed the "limited resources" constraint of the Salesforce team.

81. Frage
Northern Trail Outfitters is in the final stages of merging two Salesforce orgs, but needs to keep the retiring org available for a short period of time for lead management as it is connected to multiple public website forms. The sales department has requested that new leads are available in the new Salesforce instance within 30 minutes. Which approach requires the least amount of development effort?

A. Use the Composite REST API to aggregate multiple leads in a single call.
B. Use the Tooling API with Process Builder to insert leads in real time.
C. Call the Salesforce REST API to insert the lead into the target system.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
In an org merger scenario, a Salesforce Platform Integration Architect must often design interim solutions that balance speed of delivery with minimal development overhead. The requirement here is for leads to be synced within a 30-minute window. This is a relatively low-latency requirement that does not strictly necessitate a real-time, event-driven architecture, which typically requires more complex infrastructure like Platform Events or middleware.
Option A, calling the Salesforce REST API to insert leads into the target system, represents the standard, most straightforward approach. Since both systems are Salesforce orgs, the retiring org can be configured to make an outbound REST call to the new org's standard Lead endpoint. This can be achieved with a small amount of Apex code (such as a trigger or an invocable method called by a Flow). This approach is considered the "least development effort" because it leverages the standard REST API, which is already enabled and authenticated via a Connected App in the target org. It requires no custom API development in the target system and uses standard JSON payloads.
Option B is incorrect because the Tooling API is intended for managing metadata, system settings, and developer tools, not for standard transactional data movement like Lead insertion. Option C, using the Composite REST API, is an optimization technique designed to group multiple requests into a single call to save on API limits. While efficient for high-volume scenarios, it introduces additional development complexity regarding payload construction and bulk error handling that exceeds the "least effort" requirement for a simple Lead sync. Therefore, a standard REST call is the most direct path to meeting the 30-minute SLA with minimal coding.

82. Frage
A customer of Salesforce has used Platform Events to integrate their Salesforce instance with an external third-party artificial intelligence (AI) system. The AI system provides a prediction score for each lead that is received by Salesforce. Once the prediction score is received, the lead information is saved to Platform Events for other processes. The trigger on the Platform Events has failed ever since it was rolled out to production. Which type of monitoring should the integration consultant have considered to monitor this integration?

A. Monitor Platform Events created per hour limits across the Salesforce instance.
B. Validate that the Platform Event definition matches lead's definition.
C. Set up debug logs for Platform Event triggers to monitor performance.

Antwort: C

Begründung:
Troubleshooting failures in Platform Event-triggered logic is challenging because these triggers execute under the "Automated Process" system user, making them invisible to standard user-level monitoring. To diagnose why a trigger is failing in production, an Integration Architect must set up debug logs specifically for that trigger or the automated process user.
Debug logs provide a granular view into the execution execution path, including Apex errors, governor limit consumption, and specific DML failures. Without these logs, it is impossible to determine if the failure is due to a null pointer exception, a validation rule violation, or a record locking conflict.678 Option B is a design-time validation step; while important, it would not help mon9itor or troubleshoot a runtime failure in a deployed trigger. Option C focuses on high-level consumption limits; while reaching the "Created Per Hour" limit would prevent events from1011 being published, it would not explain why an existing trigger is failing once the event has already arrived in the bus. By proactively establishing debug logs for the integration's triggers, the consultant can pinpoint the exact line of code or system constraint causing the failure, ensuring a faster "Mean Time to Repair" (MTTR) for critical AI-driven business processes.

83. Frage
Northern Trail Outfitters needs to use Shield Platform Encryption to encrypt social security numbers in order to meet a business requirement. Which action should an integration architect take prior to the implementation of Shield Platform Encryption?

A. Use Shield Platform Encryption as a user authentication or authorization tool.
B. Encrypt all the data so that it is secure.
C. Encrypt the data using the most current key.

Antwort: C

84. Frage
A security assessment noted vulnerabilities on unmanaged packages; notably, secrets like usernames, passwords, and OAuth tokens are stored in plain text. Which persistence mechanisms should an integration architect require to ensure that secrets are protected from deliberate or inadvertent exposure?

A. Encrypted Custom Fields and Protected Custom Settings
B. Protected Custom Metadata Types and Named Credentials
C. Named Credentials and Protected Custom Settings

Antwort: C

85. Frage
......

Plat-Arch-204 Vorbereitungsfragen: https://www.deutschpruefung.com/Plat-Arch-204-deutsch-pruefungsfragen.html

P.S. Kostenlose und neue Plat-Arch-204 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von DeutschPrüfung verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1S380-X6m63qMlxzC1ra5_sMglJgNDGVv