BONUS!!! Download part of ITexamReview PT-AM-CPE dumps for free: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Qvf7Gu7psEoXJ6-uu9-BgkTnIKHY01wq
We provide you with free update for 365 days for PT-AM-CPE study guide after purchasing, and the update version will be sent to your email automatically, you just need to check your email for the update version. In addition, we have a professional team to compile and review PT-AM-CPE exam materials, therefore the quality can be guaranteed, and you can use them at ease. PT-AM-CPE Exam Materials cover most of the knowledge points for the exam, and you can master the major knowledge points for the exam as well as improve your professional ability in the process of learning.
| Certification Vendor: | Ping Identity |
|---|---|
| Exam Name: | Certified Professional - PingAM Exam |
| Exam Number: | PT-AM-CPE |
| Exam Price: | USD 300 |
| Passing Score: | 66% |
| Real Exam Qty: | 100 |
| Exam Format: | Scenario-based, Multiple Choice |
| Available Languages: | English |
| Exam Duration: | 120 minutes |
| Certificate Validity Period: | 3 years |
| Related Certifications: | Ping Identity Certified Professional |
| Sample Questions: | Ping Identity PT-AM-CPE Sample Questions |
| Exam Way: | Proctored exam (online or at testing centers) |
| Pre Condition: | Recommended experience with PingAM in production environments |
| Official Syllabus URL: | https://www.pingidentity.com/en/training/certification.html |
>> Latest PT-AM-CPE Exam Pass4sure <<
Are you an exam jittering? Are you like a cat on hot bricks before your driving test? Do you have put a test anxiety disorder? If your answer is yes, we think that it is high time for you to use our PT-AM-CPE exam question. Our PT-AM-CPE study materials have confidence to help you Pass PT-AM-CPE Exam successfully and get related certification that you long for. The PT-AM-CPE guide torrent from our company must be a good choice for you, and then we will help you understand our PT-AM-CPE test questions in detail.
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| Topic 1 |
|
| Topic 2 |
|
| Topic 3 |
|
| Topic 4 |
|
| Topic 5 |
|
NEW QUESTION # 28
To ensure the user's full name is displayed on the consent screen for an OpenID Connect application, which string should be added into the Support Claims property on the OpenID Connect tab page of the OAuth2 Provider service in PingAM?
Answer: C
Explanation:
When a client requests an OpenID Connect (OIDC) scope (like profile), PingAM 8.0.2 may present a Consent Screen to the user, asking permission to share specific claims. To make this screen user-friendly, PingAM allows administrators to map technical claim names to human-readable labels and specify localizations.
According to the PingAM documentation on "Supported Claims" in the OAuth2/OIDC Provider settings:
The format for the Supported Claims property entry is:
ClaimName|Locale|DisplayName
In this syntax:
ClaimName: The technical OIDC claim (e.g., name, email, given_name).
Locale: The ISO language code (e.g., en, fr).
DisplayName: The text that will actually appear on the UI (the "Full name" label).
Therefore, the string name|en|Full name (Option A) is the correct configuration.
Option B is incorrect because it reverses the technical name and the display name.
Option C is incorrect as it lacks the required locale component and uses full_name (which is not the standard OIDC claim name; the standard is name).
Option D attempts to perform a logic operation (+) within a configuration field where only static mapping strings are allowed. Claim composition (concatenating first and last names) is handled by the OIDC Claims Script, not by the Supported Claims UI property.
NEW QUESTION # 29
Which OpenID Connect grant flow is best to use when the relying party knows the user's identifier and wishes to gain consent for an operation from the user by means of a separate authentication device?
Answer: A
Explanation:
The scenario described-where a client (Relying Party) already knows who the user is and needs them to authorize an action on a different device-is the primary use case for the Backchannel Request Grant, also known as Client-Initiated Backchannel Authentication (CIBA).
According to the PingAM 8.0.2 documentation on "OpenID Connect Grant Flows" and "CIBA":
Unlike traditional OIDC flows (Implicit, Authorization Code, Hybrid) that require a browser redirect (front-channel) to the OpenID Provider, CIBA is a back-channel flow. It is designed for "decoupled" authentication.
The Trigger: The RP sends a request directly to PingAM's backchannel authentication endpoint, providing a user identifier (like a username or email).
The Consent: PingAM then reaches out to the user's Authentication Device (usually a smartphone with the ForgeRock Authenticator app) via a Push notification.
The Approval: The user approves the request on their phone.
The Tokens: The RP, which has been polling PingAM or waiting for a callback, receives the ID Token and Access Token.
Common real-world examples include a bank teller initiating a login on their terminal which the customer approves on their mobile banking app, or a call center agent verifying a caller's identity via a push notification. Option D is the only flow that supports this decoupled, separate-device architecture. Options A, B, and C are all "Front-channel" flows that require the user's interaction to happen in the same browser session that initiated the request.
NEW QUESTION # 30
Examining the following JSON object, what is a valid value for the type part (shown in bold font) of the claim value in a PingAM implementation?
JSON
JSON
"act": {
"sub": "(type!subject)"
}
Answer: D
Explanation:
The JSON object structure provided refers to the Actor (act) claim used in OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange (RFC 8693) within PingAM 8.0.2. This claim is essential for scenarios involving delegation or impersonation, where one entity (the actor) is performing an action on behalf of another (the subject). In PingAM, the sub (subject) field within the act claim follows a specific internal format: (type!subject).
According to the PingAM 8.0.2 documentation regarding Token Exchange Configuration, the type part of this string is a mandatory prefix that identifies the category of the identity acting as the delegate. The documentation explicitly defines two primary valid values for this type field:
usr: This specifies that the subject is a user/identity from an identity store. For instance, if a user is acting on behalf of another user, the claim would appear as "(usr!username)".
age: This specifies that the subject is an OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect-related agent or client. Examples include an OAuth 2.0 client, a Remote Consent Service agent, or a Web/Java Agent internal client. An example would be "(age!myClientID)".
While "user" and "agent" are the descriptive terms for these categories, the actual technical values recognized and emitted by PingAM in the claim string are the three-letter shorthand codes. Therefore, usr (Option B) is the correct valid value. Choosing "user" (Option D) would be technically incorrect in the context of the exact string format required by the AM engine. This formatting ensures that when the token is introspected or validated, the resource server can correctly parse whether the actor is a human user or a machine client.
NEW QUESTION # 31
In a PingAM cluster, how is the debug level set?
Answer: B
Explanation:
Debugging a PingAM 8.0.2 environment is essential for troubleshooting issues that occur at the engine level. In a multi-server deployment (a cluster), different servers may be experiencing different local issues (e.g., filesystem permissions or local JVM constraints). Therefore, debug settings are managed at the server-specific level rather than the global site level.
According to the "Debug Logging" and "Server Settings" documentation:
The debug level (e.g., error, warning, message, info) is configured on a per-instance basis. In the PingAM Administrative Console, an administrator navigates to Deployment > Servers > [Server Name] > Debugging. Here, they can set the "Debug Level" and "Debug Output" (file vs. console).
Setting the level per instance allows an administrator to increase verbosity on a single "problematic" node without flooding the logs and impacting the performance of the entire healthy cluster. While these settings eventually modify internal properties, the Admin Console is the primary and recommended interface for making these changes in version 8.0.2.
Why other options are incorrect:
Option A: While legacy versions of OpenAM used a local debug.properties file, modern PingAM stores these settings in the Configuration Store, though they are applied to specific server instances.
Option C: A "Site" is a logical grouping for load balancing. Setting a debug level on a site would force all servers in that site to change simultaneously, which is often undesirable for targeted troubleshooting.
Option D: Changing the debug level is a standard and recommended practice for troubleshooting, provided it is returned to a lower level (like error or warning) once the issue is resolved to save disk space and CPU.
NEW QUESTION # 32
A customer wishes to customize the OpenID Connect (OIDC) id_token JSON Web Token (JWT) to include the subject's employee number. Which of the following scripts should be customized to meet this requirement?
Answer: B
Explanation:
In PingAM 8.0.2, the OpenID Connect (OIDC) Claims Script is the specific extensibility point designed to govern how user information is mapped and transformed into claims within an OIDC ID token or the UserInfo response. While PingAM supports standard scopes like profile and email out of the box, specialized business requirements-such as including an "employee number" which might be stored as employeenumber in an LDAP directory-require a custom transformation.
According to the "OIDC Claims Script" reference in the PingAM documentation:
The script acts as a bridge between the Identity Store (the source of truth) and the OIDC Provider (the issuer). When a client requests a token, PingAM executes this script, providing it with a claimObjects map and the userProfile. The developer can then write Groovy or JavaScript logic to retrieve the employeeNumber attribute from the user's profile and add it to the resulting claims set.
The script typically follows this logical flow:
Identify the requested claims from the OIDC scope.
Fetch the corresponding raw attributes from the Identity Store (e.g., PingDS or AD).
Format and name the claim as per the OIDC specification or the specific client requirement (e.g., mapping LDAP employeenumber to OIDC claim emp_id).
Return the claims to be signed and embedded into the JWT.
Why other options are incorrect: Options A, C, and D reference script types that do not exist under those specific names in the standard PingAM 8.0.2 scripting engine. While there are "Access Token Modification" scripts and "Client Registration" scripts, the OIDC Claims Script is the only one authorized and designed to manage the payload of the id_token.
NEW QUESTION # 33
......
PT-AM-CPE Test Simulator Fee: https://www.itexamreview.com/PT-AM-CPE-exam-dumps.html
P.S. Free 2026 Ping Identity PT-AM-CPE dumps are available on Google Drive shared by ITexamReview: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Qvf7Gu7psEoXJ6-uu9-BgkTnIKHY01wq